If you read m/m romance solely for steamy hot sex scenes and have no expectations beyond that, you'll love this book I suspect. I tend to be pretty demanding, and this author appears to try to go a bit deeper. I read Mongrel and enjoyed it, and read a few of her books in quick succession. I found a pattern, culminating with this book (I stopped reading her books after this one).
Snow likes to create ethical dilemmas in her books and show her characters efforts to overcome them. In my opinion, she missed the mark on this one. She tried to show a man struggling with his desire for a younger man, but to my eye she ended up soapboxing for man-boy love.
I think the reason this book came across that way was that Snow's characters all have something on common. They are all, regardless of age, incapable of denying their own sexual desires. It is a pattern in her books that her characters meet someone that they are attracted to but don't care for and their brains go right out the window. Now, I know this is a stereotype of men in general and gay men in particular, but writing to stereotype in m/m fiction is a sure way to turn me off. Anyway, isn't that male stereotype the basis of the "boys will be boys" attitude that excuses behavior because they just can't help it? I am not talking about choosing to play around here as much as truly having no choice once the little brain starts asserting itself.
So in this book, there are two objects of desire. One is a boy, the other a former lover known to be manipulative. The MC is unable to say no to either of them, causing hurt to the boy and himself. The boy IS 18 when the sex takes place, but we're made to understand that it really doesn't matter because everyone matures at his own rate. This boy is so mature that he has found himself in an abusive relationship, hooking and doing porn. The author never explores whether this boy is ready for a relationship, only that age doesn't matter. So in approaching the ethical dilemma, she does it from only one direction, by having the rational voices shoot down all of the Most internal limits.
We then are shown a glimpse of this other relationship, one the MC had when HE was a young man. Things like power imbalances are exposed, the relationship was clearly unhealthy. The author NEVER HAS THE MC NOTE THE PARALLELS! Throughout the courtship of the man and boy, the man is giving fatherly advice and being a daddy, which is a common m/m erotica theme, but he never even considers the power imbalance as an issue.
And finally, this young man has been victimized and objectified, and the telling says that the MC isn't doing that, because he cares. Yet, of course, the entire showing is about sex and the boy's hot young body and how the MC gets a boner every time he sees him. So, really, he is just objectifying a just turned 18 year old boy and then rationalizing it to himself. By the way, the boy has been "in love" with the man since he was 10. No possibility of taking advantage there, huh?
And there no discussion at all of prosecuting the porn guy for child pornography, it is all written from the POV that there is no purpose to age of consent at all. It would have been nice for the author to research where that magic number came from (developmental psychology. Most 17 year olds do not have fully developed impulse control, moral reasoning, self preservation, etc. They are still in adolescence, their brains are developing.) She basically proves through the story that this 17 year old is pretty much normal for his age, self destructive and obstinate. Then she pretends that none of it matters as two people have the hots for each other, because nobody will get hurt. Did she even research the downside of statutory rape and power imbalance?