His conversation around Sovereignty is dated for sure but is the foundation that Locke and Rousseau critique (as well as others down stream). The representation of it as a being was a good step forward in providing language/metaphor to discuss these concepts.
Unlike Locke, Hobbes writes out his understanding of natural laws which I think also provide interesting insight and a basis for formulating our own understanding of the natural state and later critiques of the concept from folks like Rawls.
Not a long book so worth a read IMO if you’re interested in social contract theory as it ties Locke and Rousseau together in their critiques.
could shorten this to a "yeah bro democracy sucks so let's make our country authoritarian. oh and btw even if the sovereign sucks as well, you cannot overthrow him lol" liked the first part only
"I keep telling you people, Democracy doesn't work!"
Well reasoned, but by turns insulting and depressing. Unless, of course, you happen to be a reigning monarch. Then it's probably the feel-good read of the year.