A “text” book I suppose; but one that is surprisingly readable and very well written. I particularly enjoyed chapters on the Habsburg Lands, Prussia and Russia. Prof Hufton taught me years ago and her style of writing helped me recall her lectures: very articulate.
This period saw struggle between the centralization of the state (for 'state' usually read 'monarchy') versus noble/other privilege.
Centralization was perhaps most successful in Prussia, owing to the shrewdness of Frederick II (the Great) and his father Frederick Wm I. Frederick the Great inherited a royal domain largely intact and managed efficiently and the King therefore had more independence from the constitutional checks imposed on his fellow European monarchs. They needed to get taxes granted by their assemblies. Fred the Great was able to balance bureaucracy and nobility and cross pollenate both which lead to the aggrandisement of the state and the monarchy– and the birth of Prussianism?
Habsburgs were weak to begin with. Difficulty raising money to pay for the monarchy. Joseph II, a text book enlightened despot was an interesting character but an unlucky one. His tomb bears the inscription he chose: “Here lies the man who failed in everything he did”.
Russia with its bureaucratic military nobility dependent on the monarchy which in turn was dependant upon it. Its ruler, Catherine the Great (German) had many of her nobles educated in the west and they returned to Russia critical of her autocracy and increasingly repressive regime.
Spain and Portugal conformed less to the pattern of Enlightened Despotism, apart from a bit of window dressing.
The Chapter on The United Provinces (modern day Netherlands and Belgium) was heavy going – Town v Country, Orangeist v Patriot.
France – OH's specialism. The centralisation of the monarchy faced great opposition from the nobility and privilege and the parlements. A crisis of credit resulted from the need to finance vast monarchical expenditure. The Revolution did what the monarchy would have liked to do – abolish a vast amount of privilege, especially clerical exemption from taxation. Unfortunately for Louts XVI and Marie Antoinette they lost their heads, literally, in the process.
Only the USA – outside Europe – could point to advancement of democracy. Otherwise power was in the hands of people with wealth, however little. Great Britain was governed jointly by the aristocracy and gentry (Houses of Commons and Lords).
Sweden would fluctuate between a growing centralisation of the monarchy and an increasingly strengthened nobility, leading to the “noble” assassination of Gustav III.
Plenty to think about!