What were the most interesting things I learnt?
In the book there is a lot of detail about a group of elephants from Swaziland that were transferred to Lowry Park (the zoo the journalist studied for this book). I particularly enjoyed learning about a communicative strategy that elephants have, and how it not only facilitates intra-herd communication, but also inter-herd communication:
“Elephants routinely communicate with one another through snorts, shrieks, roars, bellows and trumpets. They also exchange information through low-frequency rumbles, most of which humans can't hear. Sometimes, people in the vicinity of elephants can feel these rumbles; the vibrations have been described as "a throbbing in the air" similar to thunder. Elephants tune into these rumbles not just with their ears, but also with their feet. Through motion sensitive cells in the soft pads of their feet, they can detect low-frequency sounds as they ripple in seismic vibrations along the ground. Elephants use these infrasonic signals to attract mates, to assert dominance, and to find and rescue calves who have fallen into watering holes or got into other trouble and are calling for help.
The trauma of the culls, then, could not be completely contained. As the targeted animals ran in vain from the helicopters, they would have been capable of sending out terrified warnings to other elephants beyond the horizon.”
Additionally, I enjoyed learning about how the approach to elephant handling has changed. Originally, keepers adopted “free contact” – trying to emulate the traditional mahout-elephant relationship observed in places like Myanmar. The principle of free contact is that the zookeeper attempts to establish themselves as the “matriarch” in the zoo’s elephant collection. In doing so successfully, they are able to consistently commandeer obedience and respect from the elephants. However, there were too many examples where elephant-keeper personalities did not match, leading to an elephant “testing” their keeper with incrementally increasing violence and eventually killing them, as was the case with Char-Lee Torre in Lowry Park. Now, something called “protected contact” is used which is safer for keepers and much better for elephant welfare.
“Used increasingly in zoos around the country, protected contact required staff members to maintain a barrier between themselves and the animals, even when they had to get close enough to check the pads of their feet ... The alternative protocol was also considered more humane for the elephants since it relied on positive reinforcement. The elephants were not dominated or prodded or punished, as they often were with free contact. Through a system of food rewards, they were encouraging to follow the trainers' commands, not intimidated into compliance.”
Is there anything I should be critical of in this work?
The author, Thomas French is a journalist. The prose reflects this strongly. It’s very clear and concisely written, but there are flashes of more sensationalist writing that come through, as well as consistent humanisation of the animals being documented. My favourite example of this is the story about Herman the chimp and Dr Murphy:
“At times Herman seemed uncannily human, understanding things that eluded the other chimps. His unusual relationship with Dr Murphy was a good example. Like many of the animals at Lowry Park, most of the chimps disliked the veterinarian because they associated him with the strong of a tranquiliser dart and other indignities required for their medical care. One day, Murphy appeared in the chimp night house with a tranquiliser gun so he could attend to Herman. Murphy was a good shot and almost never missed. But this time, his aim was off. The other chimps would have run and hid. Herman just picked up the dart, walked over to the mesh, and handed it back to Murphy so he could try again.”
In some ways, like with the above story, this was very moving and served to connect me with the animals resident to Lowry Park, but in other instances, I found it quite disturbing, like the constant reiteration of Herman’s sexual fascination with blonde women.
I am also aware that the journalist had varying relationships with the people he wrote about, most notably Lex, the zoo manager who was forced to resign after, in his last year managing the zoo, set up a for-profit game park and ferried animals to and from Lowry Park to flesh it out. This would have affected his portrayal of them in the book.
How can I use this text to help me in my career development?
This book really drove home to me how prone these organisations are to corruption by the management and how, with the wrong leader, a place for scientific advancement, protection, and safety for extensive collections of endangered species can very quickly become exploitative.
One of the main things I have taken from this realisation is that it is the keepers and those most intimately in contact with the animals who will give me the most honest account of their welfare and who will be most knowledgeable of the little quirks possessed by each species, and individual of each species that is under their care. They are the people solely involved in the institution for the animals. Their intentions are not muddied by a dual responsibility for the zoo’s finances, publicity, or popularity.
This is reflected in two quotes from the book:
“All zoos, even the most enlightened are built upon an idea both beguiling and repellent - the notion that we can seek out the wilderness of the world and behold its beauty, but that we must first contain that wilderness. Zoos argue that they are fighting for the conservation of the Earth, that they educate the public and provide refuse and support for the vanishing species. And they are right. Animal rights groups argue that zoos traffic in living creatures, exploiting them for financial gain and amusement. And they are right. Caught inside this contradiction are the animals themselves, and the humans charged with their well-being. Keepers see the realities of zoo life up close, every day. More than anyone else, they know when animals are treated well at their zoo and when they are not. “The keepers,” a veterinarian at another institution once wrote, “are the core of the zoo’s conscience”.”
The next one refers to a keeper in charge of watching over the group of 7 elephants during the flight from Swaziland to Lowry Park.
“He paid special attention to their foreheads because he knew that when elephants communicated through their infrasonic rumbles - the effort sometimes caused their foreheads to move. Even if human ears could not detect the rumbles, he wanted to see who was talking and who was responding, who was connecting and who was keeping to themselves.”
I also got quite a shocking insight into the other considerations that this field of work involves. It is not just a matter of simply giving the endangered animals some land, food, and good medical treatment. Success in breeding programmes brings with it just as many problems as failure.
I am surprised by how much re-location is a part of a wildlife veterinarian’s job, and how necessary that re-location is. I am aware that frequent re-location of critically endangered species plays a crucial role in maintaining genetic diversity in the species, but it is so interesting to learn that when a breeding programme is successful, re-location becomes mandatory because over-population of an area leads to over-grazing of wild land so intense that it becomes irrevocably barren, and that, in cases where re-location is not possible due to underfunding or no other zoos being suitable to receive the animals in questions, the animals are culled by the very people that sought to increase their numbers in the first place! Reading about how these culls must be carried out (in a helicopter with a machine gun!) coupled with what I learnt about the inter-herd communicative ability elephants possess and the psychological damage stumbling on bloodied wild land is capable of incurring on intensely emotionally intelligent species like elephants, made me realise that the constraints conservation efforts face can mean they impart just as much trauma and loss and PTSD as poaching does.
This book really opened my eyes to how immense the considerations are for conservation efforts are, and how many factors are involved. How as a wildlife vet, I might be exposed to / forced to make some very difficult decisions, and how the financial struggles companion animal vets are privy to are tenfold in this field.