What do you think?
Rate this book


At its core, an economy is about providing goods and services for human well-being. But many economists and critics preach that an economy is something far different: a cold and heartless system that operates outside of human control. In this impassioned and perceptive work, Julie A. Nelson asks a compelling question: If our economic world is something that we as humans create, aren’t ethics and human relationships—dimensions of a full and rich life—intrinsically part of the picture? Is it possible to take this thing we call economics and give it a body and a soul?
Economics for Humans argues against the well-ingrained notion that economics is immune to moral values and distant from human relationships. Here, Nelson locates the impediment to envisioning a more considerate economic world in an assumption that is shared by both neoliberals and the political left. Despite their seemingly insurmountable differences, Nelson notes that they both make use of the metaphor, first proposed by Adam Smith, that the economy is a machine. This pervasive idea, Nelson argues, has blinded us to the qualities that make us work and care for one another—qualities that also make businesses thrive and markets grow. We can wed our interest in money with our justifiable concerns about ethics and social well-being. And we can do so if we recognize that an economy is not a machine, but a living, beating heart that circulates blood to all parts of the body while also serving as an emblem of compassion and care.
Nothing less than a manifesto, Economics for Humans will both invigorate and inspire readers to reshape the way they view theeconomy, its possibilities, and their place within it.
Paperback
First published January 1, 2006
This book was offered as a free eBook from the University of Chicago, and I thought I would give it a chance (I made it through chapter 1 and some spot reading). If you are a student of Austrian economics you will immediately recognize that the author is off on a value-laden tack that will add nothing to your knowledge of how the world works. The following is an example:
So how are human bodies actually doing in contemporary capitalist societies? Examining the evidence, you can find much that calls into question the idea that market functioning automatically brings about social well-being. Of course,the richer you are and the more you have benefited from the system, the more you may be likely to see the market system through rose-colored glasses. But at the other extreme, the World Health Organization says that fifteen thousand children per day die worldwide from malnutrition-related diseases.
So, the fact that fifteen thousand children per day die is a function of capitalist societies? Has the author noticed that the more capitalist a society becomes the fewer children die of malnutrition? Are the problems of the world to be solved overnight in places like the Congo?
All in all, I think the author imagines a utopia based upon her value system--a huge problem in the social sciences. She could certainly benefit from a dose of reality in the form of Mises and Hayek. Don't waste your time if those economists guide your thinking.