Perhaps I am being too critical because the book was not at all what I expected.
According to Merriam Webster, Lamaze is a method of preparing women to give child birth without the use of drugs.
I had always thought of it as drug free coping methods in labor, specifically breathing exercises, which is the Google definition.
I was expecting a focus on laboring techniques. Instead, it is just another pregnancy, labor, and delivery book with very little to say about coping methods during childbirth. Mostly I read that women's bodies naturally know what to do, that it can help to move, rock, chant, recite birth affirmations, and get into any position that seems right. Water births, birthing balls, squating, and getting on hands and knees are also encouraged.
The book talks mostly about the history of childbirth, the evils of modern medicine, the glories of "natural" birth (as if using medicine makes a birth unnatural), body appreciation, beginning breastfeeding, how to negotiate rights in the hospital, and other topics typical pregnancy books cover.
There were parts of this book I liked, but there were also parts I obviously really did not like. I'm glad I read the first part of about how interventions are almost always evil while my husband was watching T.V. in the same room so that I didn't have fully focus on the book. I actually felt like parts of the book were using fear to drive me away from a method of birth the author felt was unworthy.
For example, the author states that doctors often try to induce a woman before the baby is ready. I agree that this can happen. She then says that the brain development is so rapid in the final days before birth, that it can make a huge difference to be born even one day early. Then she cites evidence that babies born prematurely are twice as likely to die in their first year of life!
What a scare tactic! Anyone who thinks about that statistic would realize that she is lumping babies induced at 39 weeks with babies who are born at 24 weeks, when a baby is first considered viable.
I did like the birth stories and some of the wisdom, but the hating on doctors in general got on my nerves. The more I have researched, the more I have found that there is a lot of truth to what Lothian says -- for example, that c sections are good for saving lives, not as an elective way to get out of labor and delivery. I absolutely agree with that, as does The Mayo Clinic Guide, which is written by doctors. But I felt like just because some doctors are bad, doesn't mean that they all are.