I was skeptical when my lead gave me the required creative writing textbook for the Front Range Community College CWI classes. I wasn't sure about a textbook for the craft. I've always taught technique by supplementing students with excerpts from Stephen King's, On Writing, Natalie Goldberg's, Writing Down the Bones, and others such as Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott and Gaston Bachelard's, The Poetics of Space, and while I still supplemented the text with these handouts, I read Janet Burroway's book, assigned it, and was impressed.
Personally, I was most impressed with the rhetoric. The basics on setting, voice, character, etc. helped me return to the beginner's mind (I've mostly been working with published professional writers). The creative work in the book is good as well, and diverse, but I feel more comfortable teaching the work I already know. So I also augmented a lot there--giving them Raymond Carver to read, and Flannery O'Connor, as well as other writers not included in Imaginative Writing. At one point, when I asked my students why they seemed to like my handouts more than the textbook, they answered two-fold: 1. They found the literature I gave them to be more accessible and interesting, and 2. They hate writing in books; when I explained that textbooks are designed to be written in, they either retorted that they still couldn't bring themselves to do so, or they needed to sell their books back. I think these are both good points, especially for a CWI class where almost no one is probably going to go on to become a professional writer, and thus, appreciate any book on writing the way I do.
What I didn't expect was for the textbook to influence the order I taught the genres I'm expected to teach as much as it did. I was prepared to begin with poetry, then do CNF, and end with fiction. Burroway begins the book in chapters dedicated to the more universal aspects of creative writing such as voice, setting, character, so we read those chapters, studied the different types of work, and freewrote in whatever forms it took. Then, about four weeks into the semester, we focused on CNF. I think Burroway makes a valid point when she says people like to talk about themselves. Furthermore, because the demographic of my classes (even at a community college) still tend to be young adults, their lives (however short) are still all they really know, or have to write about. Then we transitioned into Fiction. They had the basic storytelling skills down from writing CNF, they were getting comfortable with concepts like "show don't tell," and "adverbs pave the road to hell," and the best transition is no transition, which meant they were ready to branch out, and start making shit up. From there, we moved into Poetry (I chose not to cover Drama which is also in the book because I don't have to, and I don't feel that I have the expertise to do so). I'd never imagined doing poetry last, but then I read a passage from the textbook where Burroway says something like this: "All the devices and techniques required for writing good prose are also needed for writing good poetry, only more so." Wow! She couldn't be more right.
Aside from that quote, I realized poetry gave us a chance to explore other workshop methods. My class was large--starting with 18 students, and dwindling down to 15, which meant we didn't have time to workshop CNF or fiction in class. We had to break into smaller groups and do the critiques at home. Poetry, at least shorter poems, gave us the chance to finally workshop in class, which means exploring different techniques--such formats included: the workshop model where the author can't talk, but just listens and takes notes as his/her classmates discuss (in third person) what works and what doesn't. Also, this allowed the writers themselves to practice reading their work out loud; poetry is not only meant to be spoken and heard, something editorial happens when a writer reads his or her work out loud to a group of people that is different from when he or she reads it out loud by himself/herself.
I gave the textbook 4 stars instead of 5 because my students still resonated more with the handouts from King's, On Writing and Goldberg's, Writing Down the Bones. Both King and Goldberg are incredibly accessible, and there is something about getting advice straight from a master's mouth regarding craft that no textbook can ever manage. I also didn't always agree or understand why Burroway chose the creative work she did as samples of what she was addressing in each chapter, but that might just be due to the fact I'm stuck in my ways. I use this story/writer for voice, and this one for setting, and this one for character, and so on. That said, I wanted her to surprise and inspire me with her choices, and she just didn't. Or rather, she didn't as much as I would have liked. I found the best creative work was in her CNF chapter.
I've also only used this textbook once to teach one class. I know I'll be using it again, and many times, so I can see myself growing to understand the means to her madness and coming back here to change my review and my rating.