What do you think?
Waterhouse on Newspaper Style
Edited by Stella Bingham and republished in 2010, Waterhouse on Newspaper Style is still the standard, and most entertaining, manual of tabloid journalism, as important and relevant today as when it was first published in 1989.
256 pages, Paperback
First published September 7, 1989
About the author
Keith Waterhouse
82 books30 followersKeith Spencer Waterhouse CBE, was a novelist, newspaper columnist, and the writer of many television series.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
February 21, 2018
Keith Waterhouse was a journalist and author. I first came across his writing through the film of his book, Billy Liar. I came across his writing some years later, through his column in the tabloid newspaper The Daily Mirror.
I mention that latter fact because I think it important. People are often a bit snooty about the tabloids, but it's a snobbery born of ignorance. A newspaper that can make a complex topic like Brexit comprehensible to someone with a reading age of 11, which is a kind of benchmark for the tabloids, is doing a pretty good job. It takes real journalistic skill to achieve that.
The interesting thing, as Waterhouse points out in this book, is that although the tabloids write in simple terms, they are not condescending. For example, when a newspaper ran with the headline "Mucky Jim", it assumed that its readers would understand the reference to the Kingsley Amis novel, Lucky Jim.
'On newspaper style' started life as an in-house manual for journalists on the Daily Mirror. It was, in effect, the paper's house style guide. I'm glad it escaped the confines of Fleet Street because it is one of the best reference books I have read, and consult.
Some of it is humorous. For example, while the more salacious tabloids have headlines shouting about 'sex romps', nobody in everyday life talks about sex romps. In a chapter on 'Tabloidese' he makes a p[lea for using plain, normal English. For example, on Planet Tabloid, a criticism becomes a 'blast'; a drive (for or against something) is a 'blitz'; a mystery is a 'riddle'. Such drama in article after article is apt to leave one exhausted!
Waterhouse points out errors of use, such as when the second part of the sentence does not fit with the first half (for example, if you remove a subordinate clause, you would end up with a sentence that began "I have saw..."). I pride myself in trying to write well, but I've found since buying this book that I am much more sensitive to mistakes like that.
Although he is a stickler for correct English, Waterhouse is, I am pleased to say, not a stickler for what he calls 'Imaginary rules'. For instance, if splitting an infinitive makes a sentence easier to read and understand, then spilt it should be. It reminds me of Churchill's statement: "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put.".
Organised in alphabetical order, Waterhouse On Newspaper Style may be read from beginning to end, or by dipping in to chapters at random. It may be 30 years old, but much of the advice is as relevant today as it was then.
I mention that latter fact because I think it important. People are often a bit snooty about the tabloids, but it's a snobbery born of ignorance. A newspaper that can make a complex topic like Brexit comprehensible to someone with a reading age of 11, which is a kind of benchmark for the tabloids, is doing a pretty good job. It takes real journalistic skill to achieve that.
The interesting thing, as Waterhouse points out in this book, is that although the tabloids write in simple terms, they are not condescending. For example, when a newspaper ran with the headline "Mucky Jim", it assumed that its readers would understand the reference to the Kingsley Amis novel, Lucky Jim.
'On newspaper style' started life as an in-house manual for journalists on the Daily Mirror. It was, in effect, the paper's house style guide. I'm glad it escaped the confines of Fleet Street because it is one of the best reference books I have read, and consult.
Some of it is humorous. For example, while the more salacious tabloids have headlines shouting about 'sex romps', nobody in everyday life talks about sex romps. In a chapter on 'Tabloidese' he makes a p[lea for using plain, normal English. For example, on Planet Tabloid, a criticism becomes a 'blast'; a drive (for or against something) is a 'blitz'; a mystery is a 'riddle'. Such drama in article after article is apt to leave one exhausted!
Waterhouse points out errors of use, such as when the second part of the sentence does not fit with the first half (for example, if you remove a subordinate clause, you would end up with a sentence that began "I have saw..."). I pride myself in trying to write well, but I've found since buying this book that I am much more sensitive to mistakes like that.
Although he is a stickler for correct English, Waterhouse is, I am pleased to say, not a stickler for what he calls 'Imaginary rules'. For instance, if splitting an infinitive makes a sentence easier to read and understand, then spilt it should be. It reminds me of Churchill's statement: "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put.".
Organised in alphabetical order, Waterhouse On Newspaper Style may be read from beginning to end, or by dipping in to chapters at random. It may be 30 years old, but much of the advice is as relevant today as it was then.
October 8, 2024
Very funny prose and insightful to news writing, obviously relatively dated (1989).
Enjoyed the window into tabloid journalism and the historical rise of it. Feel it helps with grammatical structure and how to worm in wordplay and the such.
Enjoyed the window into tabloid journalism and the historical rise of it. Feel it helps with grammatical structure and how to worm in wordplay and the such.
October 26, 2011
This book is only mildly informative, unless you're a tabloid hack whose idea of writing a great story is maximizing its pun count. But I was doubled up with laughter through most of it, mainly because of Waterhouse's brilliant eye for the worst excesses of the newspaper industry. You could open the book on any random page and find a gem, from the worst headlines ('TORCH BOY SET ABLAZE BY GANG') to the tabloidese that is, decades after the first edition of this book was published, still alive and kicking ('HYPNOTIST PUT PATIENTS UNDER FOR SEX ROMPS'). It's only a short book with some hilarious illustrations, and well worth a flick through.
March 9, 2011
Brilliant, savage and very funny
February 20, 2019
Not a laugh a minute
May 24, 2022
I took up this book as a diversion to my book on journalism (at the prior book’s recommendation).
The wise words of Keith Waterhouse apply just as readily to conventional writing and American journalism as they do the British.
As an American writer / reader, some of the prose and examples took a little research, as I’ve never seen them applied so starkly in American newspapers. A very handy book that I would recommend to any aspiring writer interested in journalistic style.
The wise words of Keith Waterhouse apply just as readily to conventional writing and American journalism as they do the British.
As an American writer / reader, some of the prose and examples took a little research, as I’ve never seen them applied so starkly in American newspapers. A very handy book that I would recommend to any aspiring writer interested in journalistic style.
January 25, 2021
Essential for any writers - journalists and non-journalists alike - seeking to avoid the worst cliches in English. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry, you’ll take a scythe to your own copy.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews