What do you think?
Rate this book
Original Sin: Power, Technology and War in Outer Space
Space technology was developed to enhance the killing power of the state. The Moon landings and the launch of the Space Shuttle were mere sideshows, drawing public attention away from the real military and economic control of space as a source of power on Earth.
Today, as Bleddyn E. Bowen vividly recounts, thousands of satellites work silently in the background to provide essential military, intelligence and economic capabilities. No major power can do without them. Beyond Washington, Moscow and Beijing, truly global technologies have evolved, from the ground floor of the nuclear missile revolution to today's orbital battlefield, shaping the wars to come. World powers including India, Japan and Europe are fully realizing the strategic benefits of commanding Earth's 'cosmic coastline', as a stage for war, development and prestige.
Yet, as new contenders spend more and more on outer space, there is scope for cautious optimism about the future of the Space Age-if we can recognize, rather than hide, its original sin.
Today, as Bleddyn E. Bowen vividly recounts, thousands of satellites work silently in the background to provide essential military, intelligence and economic capabilities. No major power can do without them. Beyond Washington, Moscow and Beijing, truly global technologies have evolved, from the ground floor of the nuclear missile revolution to today's orbital battlefield, shaping the wars to come. World powers including India, Japan and Europe are fully realizing the strategic benefits of commanding Earth's 'cosmic coastline', as a stage for war, development and prestige.
Yet, as new contenders spend more and more on outer space, there is scope for cautious optimism about the future of the Space Age-if we can recognize, rather than hide, its original sin.
- GenresSpaceNonfictionWar
573 pages, Kindle Edition
First published October 27, 2022
16 people are currently reading
147 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews
August 4, 2024
Just finished:
New York: Oxford University Press, 2023.
Not a book from r a novice. If you like complex tech and an alphabet soup of acronyms, this book is for you.
The authors main argument is that behind all the satellite imagery, space flights, and moon walks, that space has always been militarized. He also argues that actions in space are a continuation of colonialism. The book looks at the Cold War space race and expands to efforts of European nations, Japan, China, and India.
I read this book because I wanted to know what military actions would look like in space, I think I would have been better served to read newspapers articles instead.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2023.
Not a book from r a novice. If you like complex tech and an alphabet soup of acronyms, this book is for you.
The authors main argument is that behind all the satellite imagery, space flights, and moon walks, that space has always been militarized. He also argues that actions in space are a continuation of colonialism. The book looks at the Cold War space race and expands to efforts of European nations, Japan, China, and India.
I read this book because I wanted to know what military actions would look like in space, I think I would have been better served to read newspapers articles instead.
March 29, 2024
Writing about the American space program involves two significant challenges. One is new. The rise of commercial space companies like SpaceX, Rocket Lab, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic has radically increased the amount and pace of information generated on the topic. To use a familiar metaphor, keeping up with space news these days is like drinking from a firehose.
The other challenge is roughly as old as orbital launches themselves: the fact that much of what America does in space is defense-related, and takes place behind closed…um…apertures. Granted, some very dated Department of Defense operations are now public record. For example, we now know all about the Air Force’s top-secret Lunex Project, which called for creation of an underground military base on the moon. Space fans are well aware of the Dyna-Soar orbital bomber and the Manned Orbital Laboratory, once-sexy Pentagon projects whose origins can be traced back to the days when Khrushchev was banging his shoe on a desk at the United Nations and promising that international communism would bury us. (News Flash, Nikita: You’re going to need a bigger shovel.)
But a lot of Defense Department and National Reconnaissance Office work remains strictly classified, many years after such work has been completed. And given that at least half of the fifty-five billion or so dollars we spend each year on space technology and operations goes to the military or the NRO, we’re left with a big gap in our understanding of what, exactly, U.S. satellites and spacecraft are doing and why they’re doing it. Secret missions are part of our space program too.
In fact, if you read Bleddyn E. Bowen’s book Original Sin: Power, Technology, and War in Outer Space, published electronically last year by Oxford University Press, you may well conclude that secret military missions are the most important part of our space program. Original Sin is a good way to get a look at the history and thinking behind the machines our friends at the Pentagon—and military planners in Beijing, Moscow, and Mumbai, for that matter—are putting into orbit or planning to shoot down OUT of orbit. SATCOMs, ASATs, C4ISR systems and SSBMs, they’re all here—in excruciating strings of acronyms, at times.
Bowen’s thesis is that all space technology is tainted by an “original sin”—the fact that rockets were created in order to kill people. This stain sullies the microgravitational dreams not only of the U.S. but also of all the other Big Six space powers—Russia, China, India, Japan, and the European Union. “The foundations of space technology and infrastructure are rooted in imperialism,” Bowen writes, adding an ancillary sin just for good measure. “Space warfare is merely the continuation of terrestrial politics by other means due to the original sin of space technology,” he goes on to say, and “not even the remarkable and humbling images of [the Hubble Space Telescope] escape the original sin of space technology.”
Insert eye roll here. Repent, ye vile orbital observation instrument!
Bowen’s argument is suspect from the jump. After all, the first liquid-fueled rockets were built by an eccentric New Englander named Robert Goddard, who had no particular military inclinations. But even accepting the factual premise of his thesis, Bowen’s portrait of the evolution of space technology leaves out one crucial element of the theology he borrows from: Redemption. He’s not much interested in the scientific work that has been done in space. He doesn’t care that the presence of anorthosite in the moon rocks brought back by Apollo astronauts provides clues to the mysterious origins of both Earth and the moon, nor that our satellites have detected thousands of worlds in other solar systems, or that Hubble actually imaged that long-theorized phenomenon now thought to be at the center of most galaxies, a black hole. Neither discovery nor wonder fit into the author’s argument regarding the accursed nature of cosmic tech. Because this is true, his view of space exploration is perhaps as limited in its own way as the average flower child’s optimism that humanity is bound to find a home in the heavens because we’re all made of star dust.
But we’ve all heard enough of that. Despite his rhetorical excesses, Bowen does provide a much-needed tonic to notions of space exploration as “a spiritual quest, a rite of purification for humanity, a road to absolution.” Rather than surrendering ourselves to pie-in-the-sky notions of space as a uniter, as a sort of campground where we’ll all gather to sing a cosmic kumbaya, we have to face up to the fact that machines like the Falcon 9 and the Long March 5 allow the most powerful nations on Earth to be the most powerful nations in space, and the best able to exploit whatever resources can be ripped out of the moon or nearby asteroids. Far from an extraterrestrial Elysium, space is just as likely to be a battleground—and, quite possibly, a boneyard. Our politics have followed us into orbit, and will likely follow us further. We are who we are, and pretending that we’ll somehow forget our national, ethnic, and religious prejudices and affiliations in the near future just because we’re outside the Van Allen Belts is naïve.
Though I wasn’t a fan of the theoretical meanderings of the book, its recitations and refutations of scholarly writings from days gone by, I did find all kinds of interesting facts and recitations in the pages of Original Sin. The Pentagon commenced building satellite tracking stations in the mid-1950s, Bowen reveals, well before Sputnik flew. Four nations—the U.S., Russia, China, and India—have blown up satellites in orbit, creating large fields of debris hazardous to other space vehicles. America’s first successful satellite assassination came in May of 1963, when we destroyed an orbiting Agena D upper stage with a Nike-Zeus missile. After the Sino-Soviet split in the sixties, and before we became enemies of the People’s Republic of China, we were wary allies, sharing military intelligence and constructing a shared monitoring system in the mountains of western China meant to keep an eye on Soviet space launches. (Because, after all, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.) Deng Xiaoping visited Washington and even toured the headquarters of the CIA, apparently at the invitation of a young senator named Joe Biden. In 2010, the space shuttle Atlantis evidently deployed a “lurker” satellite named Prowler, capable of sidling up to the satellites of other nations in geostationary orbit to surveil and classify them. Like so many other defense-related programs, including the U.S. Space Force’s X-37B orbital space plane, Prowler is a subject—and a satellite—that remains taboo to this day.
If you have an interest in space warfare theory, along with a taste for historical fact-finding, this may be the book for you. But fair warning: It’s not an easy read. You’ll need to dig in, and provide yourself with logistical support, including telecommunications, because you’re going to be occupied for a while. But the pay-off is worth the work. Original Sin is a mostly balanced, credible tour of military space technology and how we, and other space powers of the world, arrived at where we are today. Looking back at Earth from space may engender feelings of shared humanity and love for the planet—the so-called “Overview Effect,” as defined by space philosopher Frank White. Looking up from ground zero at the constellation of communications and surveillance satellites placed there to aid us in our seemingly ceaseless conflicts engenders what I would call, by contrast, the Underview Effect—the sinking feeling that maybe we’re not going to make it to the stars after all. But that’s okay with Bowen. He doesn’t even see the stars—just the vast dark spaces in between.
The other challenge is roughly as old as orbital launches themselves: the fact that much of what America does in space is defense-related, and takes place behind closed…um…apertures. Granted, some very dated Department of Defense operations are now public record. For example, we now know all about the Air Force’s top-secret Lunex Project, which called for creation of an underground military base on the moon. Space fans are well aware of the Dyna-Soar orbital bomber and the Manned Orbital Laboratory, once-sexy Pentagon projects whose origins can be traced back to the days when Khrushchev was banging his shoe on a desk at the United Nations and promising that international communism would bury us. (News Flash, Nikita: You’re going to need a bigger shovel.)
But a lot of Defense Department and National Reconnaissance Office work remains strictly classified, many years after such work has been completed. And given that at least half of the fifty-five billion or so dollars we spend each year on space technology and operations goes to the military or the NRO, we’re left with a big gap in our understanding of what, exactly, U.S. satellites and spacecraft are doing and why they’re doing it. Secret missions are part of our space program too.
In fact, if you read Bleddyn E. Bowen’s book Original Sin: Power, Technology, and War in Outer Space, published electronically last year by Oxford University Press, you may well conclude that secret military missions are the most important part of our space program. Original Sin is a good way to get a look at the history and thinking behind the machines our friends at the Pentagon—and military planners in Beijing, Moscow, and Mumbai, for that matter—are putting into orbit or planning to shoot down OUT of orbit. SATCOMs, ASATs, C4ISR systems and SSBMs, they’re all here—in excruciating strings of acronyms, at times.
Bowen’s thesis is that all space technology is tainted by an “original sin”—the fact that rockets were created in order to kill people. This stain sullies the microgravitational dreams not only of the U.S. but also of all the other Big Six space powers—Russia, China, India, Japan, and the European Union. “The foundations of space technology and infrastructure are rooted in imperialism,” Bowen writes, adding an ancillary sin just for good measure. “Space warfare is merely the continuation of terrestrial politics by other means due to the original sin of space technology,” he goes on to say, and “not even the remarkable and humbling images of [the Hubble Space Telescope] escape the original sin of space technology.”
Insert eye roll here. Repent, ye vile orbital observation instrument!
Bowen’s argument is suspect from the jump. After all, the first liquid-fueled rockets were built by an eccentric New Englander named Robert Goddard, who had no particular military inclinations. But even accepting the factual premise of his thesis, Bowen’s portrait of the evolution of space technology leaves out one crucial element of the theology he borrows from: Redemption. He’s not much interested in the scientific work that has been done in space. He doesn’t care that the presence of anorthosite in the moon rocks brought back by Apollo astronauts provides clues to the mysterious origins of both Earth and the moon, nor that our satellites have detected thousands of worlds in other solar systems, or that Hubble actually imaged that long-theorized phenomenon now thought to be at the center of most galaxies, a black hole. Neither discovery nor wonder fit into the author’s argument regarding the accursed nature of cosmic tech. Because this is true, his view of space exploration is perhaps as limited in its own way as the average flower child’s optimism that humanity is bound to find a home in the heavens because we’re all made of star dust.
But we’ve all heard enough of that. Despite his rhetorical excesses, Bowen does provide a much-needed tonic to notions of space exploration as “a spiritual quest, a rite of purification for humanity, a road to absolution.” Rather than surrendering ourselves to pie-in-the-sky notions of space as a uniter, as a sort of campground where we’ll all gather to sing a cosmic kumbaya, we have to face up to the fact that machines like the Falcon 9 and the Long March 5 allow the most powerful nations on Earth to be the most powerful nations in space, and the best able to exploit whatever resources can be ripped out of the moon or nearby asteroids. Far from an extraterrestrial Elysium, space is just as likely to be a battleground—and, quite possibly, a boneyard. Our politics have followed us into orbit, and will likely follow us further. We are who we are, and pretending that we’ll somehow forget our national, ethnic, and religious prejudices and affiliations in the near future just because we’re outside the Van Allen Belts is naïve.
Though I wasn’t a fan of the theoretical meanderings of the book, its recitations and refutations of scholarly writings from days gone by, I did find all kinds of interesting facts and recitations in the pages of Original Sin. The Pentagon commenced building satellite tracking stations in the mid-1950s, Bowen reveals, well before Sputnik flew. Four nations—the U.S., Russia, China, and India—have blown up satellites in orbit, creating large fields of debris hazardous to other space vehicles. America’s first successful satellite assassination came in May of 1963, when we destroyed an orbiting Agena D upper stage with a Nike-Zeus missile. After the Sino-Soviet split in the sixties, and before we became enemies of the People’s Republic of China, we were wary allies, sharing military intelligence and constructing a shared monitoring system in the mountains of western China meant to keep an eye on Soviet space launches. (Because, after all, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.) Deng Xiaoping visited Washington and even toured the headquarters of the CIA, apparently at the invitation of a young senator named Joe Biden. In 2010, the space shuttle Atlantis evidently deployed a “lurker” satellite named Prowler, capable of sidling up to the satellites of other nations in geostationary orbit to surveil and classify them. Like so many other defense-related programs, including the U.S. Space Force’s X-37B orbital space plane, Prowler is a subject—and a satellite—that remains taboo to this day.
If you have an interest in space warfare theory, along with a taste for historical fact-finding, this may be the book for you. But fair warning: It’s not an easy read. You’ll need to dig in, and provide yourself with logistical support, including telecommunications, because you’re going to be occupied for a while. But the pay-off is worth the work. Original Sin is a mostly balanced, credible tour of military space technology and how we, and other space powers of the world, arrived at where we are today. Looking back at Earth from space may engender feelings of shared humanity and love for the planet—the so-called “Overview Effect,” as defined by space philosopher Frank White. Looking up from ground zero at the constellation of communications and surveillance satellites placed there to aid us in our seemingly ceaseless conflicts engenders what I would call, by contrast, the Underview Effect—the sinking feeling that maybe we’re not going to make it to the stars after all. But that’s okay with Bowen. He doesn’t even see the stars—just the vast dark spaces in between.
February 5, 2025
This work is truly exceptional. It delves into the often unspoken politics of space technology, providing a thorough, in-depth, and academically rigorous analysis of the vast array of resources available in the military, international relations, and historical fields. It precisely captures the core elements of space technology, often overlooked or unrecognized. It is truly on point.
I must say that while the core argument is exceptionally well-crafted and accurate, that space technology and exploration originate from and remain tied to power dynamics (military, political, and economic), the final dismissal of the social, communal, and scientific value of space exploration feels harsh. On point, but perhaps too harsh. While it is definitely true that world politics (and, by extension, space politics) are shaped by an anarchic international system, where states operate under a power-maximising rationale, and while space enthusiasts often overlook (or worse, neglect) the true nature of space technology, I also believe that constructing a unifying, collaborative narrative around space exploration can be a valuable asset. Or at least, it brings more benefits than problems.
This does not mean that experts, politicians, and business leaders should rely solely on the simplistic and superficial idea of space as a unifying cosmic quest for human evolution. On the contrary, it is essential to clearly understand the power dynamics of space technology in order to, if desired, steer it toward a more prosperous future. However, the construction of narratives plays a significant role in societies, and I believe that a unifying, inspiring, and aspirational vision of space exploration, rather than a divisive, alienating, and disillusioning one, is highly beneficial to the public.
That being said, this book is truly remarkable. It may not be particularly accessible to the general public, but it is undoubtedly a must-read for anyone involved in the space sector. Thank you for this astonishing work!
P.S. I particularly appreciated the section on dismantling the concept of space as the "ultimate high ground." It really made me understand the role of space in world affairs better.
I must say that while the core argument is exceptionally well-crafted and accurate, that space technology and exploration originate from and remain tied to power dynamics (military, political, and economic), the final dismissal of the social, communal, and scientific value of space exploration feels harsh. On point, but perhaps too harsh. While it is definitely true that world politics (and, by extension, space politics) are shaped by an anarchic international system, where states operate under a power-maximising rationale, and while space enthusiasts often overlook (or worse, neglect) the true nature of space technology, I also believe that constructing a unifying, collaborative narrative around space exploration can be a valuable asset. Or at least, it brings more benefits than problems.
This does not mean that experts, politicians, and business leaders should rely solely on the simplistic and superficial idea of space as a unifying cosmic quest for human evolution. On the contrary, it is essential to clearly understand the power dynamics of space technology in order to, if desired, steer it toward a more prosperous future. However, the construction of narratives plays a significant role in societies, and I believe that a unifying, inspiring, and aspirational vision of space exploration, rather than a divisive, alienating, and disillusioning one, is highly beneficial to the public.
That being said, this book is truly remarkable. It may not be particularly accessible to the general public, but it is undoubtedly a must-read for anyone involved in the space sector. Thank you for this astonishing work!
P.S. I particularly appreciated the section on dismantling the concept of space as the "ultimate high ground." It really made me understand the role of space in world affairs better.
February 19, 2023
Original Sin
Book 8 of 2023. In this well researched and insightful book, Bowen lays out the astropolitical realities of our space heritage, and suggests that space warfare was an inevitable outcome of choices that leading states made. He indicates that there isn’t much absolution for this “original sin,” except for major political realignment around conduct of states in space. This is sobering, as such realignment is unlikely in currency circumstances.
The book is a wake up call that Space Policy should be comprehensive and not just domain of Generals and Scientists. Citizens should demand a comprehensive space policy that questions whether national space goals serve the electorate.
It’s worth the time he spends recognizing that we wouldn’t have a space industry without the unfortunate origins that is shared among spacefaring nations: rocket research built on the backs of nazis and slave labor, nuclear arms races, etc. certainly redemption must involve a penance for this foundation.
Not enough space was used to explore the convergence of civil and military platforms, especially in satcom, which represents a challenge to norms of warfare. Scrutiny of what appropriate targets for weapons like ASAT missiles or jamming might be, and where this is based in policy, could be another book altogether.
Book 8 of 2023. In this well researched and insightful book, Bowen lays out the astropolitical realities of our space heritage, and suggests that space warfare was an inevitable outcome of choices that leading states made. He indicates that there isn’t much absolution for this “original sin,” except for major political realignment around conduct of states in space. This is sobering, as such realignment is unlikely in currency circumstances.
The book is a wake up call that Space Policy should be comprehensive and not just domain of Generals and Scientists. Citizens should demand a comprehensive space policy that questions whether national space goals serve the electorate.
It’s worth the time he spends recognizing that we wouldn’t have a space industry without the unfortunate origins that is shared among spacefaring nations: rocket research built on the backs of nazis and slave labor, nuclear arms races, etc. certainly redemption must involve a penance for this foundation.
Not enough space was used to explore the convergence of civil and military platforms, especially in satcom, which represents a challenge to norms of warfare. Scrutiny of what appropriate targets for weapons like ASAT missiles or jamming might be, and where this is based in policy, could be another book altogether.
February 20, 2023
Bloated, disorganized, and self-righteous, Bowen’s Original Sin: Power, Technology and War in Outer Space is a book that tries to place space security in the broader discussion of international politics and relations. Fortunately, better scholars have already accomplished this task and students and national security professionals can spare themselves the utter pointlessness of reading this book.
The main fault of the book is that it doesn’t make choices. Is it a history? If it is it doesn’t follow much a sequence and tends to jump forward and back several decades within the space of a page or two. For a book on international relations, it seems odd from a scholarly perspective as the book never tries to place space or IR within the theoretical context. At best this book is a manifesto, railing against the military and intelligence foundations of all aspects of space issues…without really providing much of a reconstruction to discuss alternatives.
The main fault of the book is that it doesn’t make choices. Is it a history? If it is it doesn’t follow much a sequence and tends to jump forward and back several decades within the space of a page or two. For a book on international relations, it seems odd from a scholarly perspective as the book never tries to place space or IR within the theoretical context. At best this book is a manifesto, railing against the military and intelligence foundations of all aspects of space issues…without really providing much of a reconstruction to discuss alternatives.
November 12, 2023
negative
The author’s displeasure with the way the US has approached space is very apparent in this book. He does not like the term “the ultimate high ground” and dedicates a whole chapter to discrediting the concept. With that said, a lot of good information here for the military practitioner. I did not realize the ties between nuclear and space programs.
The author’s displeasure with the way the US has approached space is very apparent in this book. He does not like the term “the ultimate high ground” and dedicates a whole chapter to discrediting the concept. With that said, a lot of good information here for the military practitioner. I did not realize the ties between nuclear and space programs.
February 11, 2023
Must read for folks studying/working in foreign affairs/international relations and/or strategy
January 3, 2024
Incredible discussion on the reality of the technopolotics of space, great historical analysis, and a fair look at current and future developments and their drivers.
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews