Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive

Rate this book
One of the foremost figures of Western intellectual thought in the late 19th century, John Stuart Mill offered up examinations of human rights, personal and societal rights and responsibilities, and the striving for individual happiness that continue to impact our philosophies, both private and political, to this day. In this, his definitive work, Mill lays the groundwork for his philosophy: his theory of names and naming, his general characterization of reasoning and inference, his ideas on "necessary truths," his thinking on the laws of nature, his deductive method, and much more. First published in 1843, this is a replica of the 1886 "People's Edition," and is essential reading for students of Mill in particular and of 19th-century philosophy in general. English philosopher and politician JOHN STUART MILL (1806-1873) served as an administrator in the East Indian Company from 1823 to 1858, and as a member of parliament from 1865 to 1868. Among his essays on a wide range of political and social thought are Principles of Political Economy (1848), Considerations on Representative Government (1861), and The Subjection of Women (1869).

622 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1843

77 people are currently reading
951 people want to read

About the author

John Stuart Mill

2,017 books1,966 followers
John Stuart Mill, English philosopher, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century. He was an exponent of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham, although his conception of it was very different from Bentham's.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
42 (33%)
4 stars
43 (34%)
3 stars
34 (27%)
2 stars
4 (3%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
Profile Image for Elia Mantovani.
218 reviews5 followers
February 12, 2021
Provare a scrivere una breve recensione di opere monumentali come il Sistema di Mill è senza dubbio impegnativo e probabilmente impossibile. In questo ardimentoso trattato, che negli anni '40 del XIX secolo fece per la prima volta circolare il nome del grande teoreta Inglese, Mill indaga la logica così come intesa in tempi moderni, ossia come la scienza delle scienze, la ragione delle principali strutture del pensiero scientifico. La giustificazione dell'induzione in apologia di Bacone e accusa di Hume si risolve, sostanzialmente, in un accennato probabilismo (tesi, tra l'altro, alla quale perverrà anche Russell, del quale Mill fu padrino battesimale), come suggerito dalle ampie considerazioni sopra l'opera di Laplace. Interessanti le riflessioni in merito al necessitarismo, questo sì di matrice humeana, che l'Autore cerca di combinare con l'idea di un libero arbitrio compatibile con la legge di causazione che introduce l'uomo in un sistema logicamente determinato. Certo, alla luce della filosofia della scienza del secolo scorso il teorema di uniformità della natura lascia insoddisfatti, ma è indubbio che questo sia stata una delle posizioni maggiormente diffuse in difesa del ragionamento induttivo (che per Mill è il vero motore del progresso teorico, essendo il sillogismo nient'altro se non una particolare guisa di petitio principi). Come osservava Feyerabend, tuttavia, l'eredità di Mill presso gli epistemologi del Novecento è incredibile: il "metodo della differenza" non è niente se non una formulazione più tradizionale di quel "modus tollens" sul quale Popper avrebbe eretto un intero criterio logico per demarcare scienza e pseudo-scienza. Un po' troppo dal sapore positivista, secondo me, l'indagine conclusiva sui metodi delle scienze sociali che, se mai godranno dello statuto autonomo delle scienze dure, secondo il filosofo possono essere oggetto di inferenze conclusive se si osservano le tendenze ricorrenti durante la storia e la cosiddetta "etologia". Il testo, insomma, offre una doviziosissima panoramica della storia della logica da Aristotele a Kant passando per gli Scolastici, Leibniz e gli Empiristi e, per quanto la lettura non possa certo dirsi alla portata di ognuno, è sicuramente una pietra miliare nella storia della logica e dell'epistemologia che può arricchire la visione della teoria del ragionamento nei suoi sviluppi e nei suoi dipanamenti concettuali.
Profile Image for Andrew Noselli.
709 reviews81 followers
March 9, 2022
The first half was about analytical logic, which I found more compelling than the second half, which dealt with the logic of language, perhaps.
Profile Image for Tyler.
104 reviews32 followers
October 29, 2024
This, while not an overly complex work, will remain one of my favorites in the field of philosophy, science, and logic. The general idea is basically that it is a compendium of different ideas. A pot pourri of certain stances, philosophies, and overall questions, many of which, even within science, have remain unanswered to this present day. The idea of Free Will and determinism, the validity of the scientific method, the foundation of language, syllogisms and how they were derived from Aristotle, the overall methodology of categorization, biological determinism, the foundations of astronomical observations, the different questions of sociologically correct methods in generating collective behavioral data, the overall questions of the validity of certain schools of thought, such as economics, and their application to the state, all of these questions are gone over in great detail. This is a great book, and is only valued because of its overall breadth, not necessarily the depth.
497 reviews4 followers
April 20, 2017
A good though rather technical philosophical book, useful to have a philosophical dictionary as a companion. It does set out a pattern requisite for rational thought and, does express its superiority to inconsistent emotional decisions, though it (the suggested method) does allow for emotional input.
His defence of Malthus,"An essay on the principal of population."may have been salient in the mid-1800s but is now demonstrably incorrect, as shown by freely available data. And using Mills methods Malthus's claims would have been refuted, but given that the data was not available Mill's assertion can be forgiven.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.