Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs

Rate this book
This book critically assesses arguments for the existence of the God of classical theism, develops an innovative account of objects’ persistence, and defends new arguments against classical theism. The authors engage the following classical theistic proofs: Aquinas’s First Way, Aquinas’s De Ente argument, and Feser’s Aristotelian, Neo-Platonic, Augustinian, Thomistic, and Rationalist proofs. The authors also provide the first systematic treatment of the ‘existential inertia thesis’. By connecting the thesis to relativity theory and recent developments in the philosophy of physics, and by developing a variety of novel existential-inertia-friendly explanations of persistence, they mount a formidable new case against classical theistic proofs. Finally, they defend new arguments against classical theism based on abstract objects and changing divine knowledge. The text appeals to students, researchers, and others interested in classical theistic proofs, the existence and nature of God, and the ultimate explanations of persistence, change, and contingency.
« Less

378 pages, Hardcover

Published November 30, 2022

2 people are currently reading
95 people want to read

About the author

Joseph C. Schmid

2 books22 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (87%)
4 stars
1 (12%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Matthew Adelstein.
99 reviews28 followers
May 16, 2024
Joe thoroughly wrecks Feser's classical theistic proofs! Quite convincing.
Profile Image for Kyle.
409 reviews
January 6, 2025
Very interesting (although very abstract and philosophical) ideas are explored. Schmid (and Linford) do a good job of making the ideas understandable (though it can be highly technical). I found their presentation quite readable and the ideas thought-provoking. I very much appreciate that they are trying to be very clear about what they are saying and what they are arguing for/against.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.