"To begin, if the rhetoric of racial transcendence gives the impression--as it does, almost by definition--that the racial injustices of the past are no longer instrumental in determining life chances and outcomes, it will become increasingly likely that persons seeing significant racial stratification in society will rationalize those disparities as owing to some cultural or biological flaw on the part of those at the bottom of the hierarchy. In other words, racial bias would become almost rational once observers of inequity were deprived of the critical social context needed to understand the conditions they observe. Whereas a color-conscious approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of racial inequities and how they've been generated, colorblindness encourages placing blame for the conditions of inequity on those who have been the targets of systemic injustice. Ironically, this means that colorblindness, often encouraged as the ultimate non-racist mentality, might have the consequence of giving new life to racist thinking."
"Illuminated individualism seeks to respect the uniqueness of all persons and communities--and thus not to assume that racial identity or country of origin, as in the case of non-citizens seeking to become residents, automatically tells us what we need to know about a person and their background--while yet acknowledging the general truth that to be white, a person of color, indigenous, or an immigrant continues to have meaning in the United States."
'Whether race is a burden or a benefit is all the same to the race neutral theorists; that is what they mean when they speak of being colorblind. They are colorblind, all right--blind to the consequences of being the wrong color in America today.' --Julian Bond, Chairman, NAACP 2003
"Evidence points to a process whereby whites over-remember stereotype-confirming behavior or tendencies in applicants of color, and ignore the same traits in whites. So, for instance, if a person of color mispronounces a word, ends a sentence with a preposition, or stumbles while speaking during an job interview, it may trigger what psychologists call a mental schema (or set of ideas that are linked to one another in memory) regarding stereotypes of inadequate black performance and ability. Yet, if a white job applicant did the very same things, it would not trigger remembrance of a stereotypical and negative schema regarding white people (because there are none when it comes to intelligence), and it would likely be forgotten or never even noticed."
"So if a black person of some notoriety agrees with a racist assumption made regularly by white people, those white people can no longer be thought of as engaging in racism. Which means, by definition, that if even one prominent black person can be found who would defend segregation or enslavement--and of course, such persons existed--neither of those amounted to racism either: a position so intellectually putrid as to merit no further comment."
"Having to be 'twice as good' to get half as far, even when one manages to pull it off, can easily devolve into a real-life 'John Henryism,' in which, like the folk legend about the steel-driving man who wanted to prove he could pound rail ties as well as a machine, individuals who fall prey to it prove themselves, only to die early from over-stress."
From the Journal of the National Medical Association:
'The failure to address differences in the behavior towards and opportunities afforded to racial/ethnic minorities contributes to the inability to eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in health. Too often, programs designed to eliminate disparities focus on educating the community without regard for their environment and other circumstances that restrict their freedom of choice and opportunities. Addressing racism as it relates to racial/ethnic health disparities requires an assessment of its prevalence and an understanding of the specific manner in which it operates, not only in the social environment, but in healthcare delivery systems as well.'