Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Trying Cases to Win: Direct Examination

Rate this book
Herbert J. Stern, nationally recognized trial lawyer and accomplished teacher of trial techniques, will show you how to win cases.<p class=copymedium>In <b>Trying Cases to Win</b>, Stern elaborates on the techniques he's made famous in his seminars and videos as he commits to print his methods and strategies for trying cases to win.<p class=copymedium>"He masterfully weaves these guiding principles into a new way of life for the trial lawyer. You would not want this book to get into the hands of your adversary." --Jeffrey D. Robertson, New York, NY<p class=copymedium>In this volume, Stern takes you through a variety of direct examination techniques that will keep you in control and in charge, driving home his points using transcripts from a broad variety of cases that bring his philosophy to life.

457 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1995

1 person is currently reading
30 people want to read

About the author

Herbert Jay Stern

18 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (70%)
4 stars
1 (10%)
3 stars
1 (10%)
2 stars
1 (10%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Meghan.
10 reviews
May 1, 2022
The final full chapter where he works through Rigo’s direct is very tedious but very rewarding. You see everything in action, pages of a transcript more than 50 years old come alive.
Profile Image for Joanna.
1,738 reviews52 followers
December 4, 2013
Herbert Stern has done a fine job combining trial war stories with practical, how-to advice for trial lawyers. His theories for jury trials are contrary to much of the common received wisdom about what to do. I really enjoyed the first volume (opening statements, or, as Stern prefers, opening arguments) and was looking forward to following up with this volume on direct examination. He focuses on crafting a direct examination, particularly of key witnesses, to be a persuasive argument at the time of testimony and not merely the putting in of evidence to allow a strong closing. In particular, Stern rejects the idea that a good direct involves a witness telling his own story in chronological order. Highly recommended reading for trial lawyers. Not especially interesting for lay readers.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.