What do you think?
Rate this book
Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom
A scathing indictment of the growing role of junk science in our courtrooms. Peter W. Huber shows how time and again lawyers have used—and the courts have accepted—spurious claims by so-called expert witnesses to win astronomical judgments that have bankrupted companies, driven doctors out of practice, and deprived us all of superior technologies and effective, life-saving therapies.
- GenresScienceLawNonfiction
288 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1962
2 people are currently reading
113 people want to read
About the author
Peter W. Huber
22 books6 followersPeter William Huber earned a law degree from Harvard University in 1982, and a doctorate in mechanical engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a partner at the law firm of Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, an author who writes on drug development, energy, technology, and the law and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
March 14, 2024
dnf’ed bc this guy writes in an incredibly annoying voice.
May 10, 2025
The topic is of utmost importance, and of great interest to me, and still ... I really disliked the conversational tone, making reading difficult ... but even getting over that: I started to skip page after page 3/4 into it ... the repetition was maddening by the end ...
April 1, 2020
The topic is interesting and perhaps important, but not this literary treatment (a windy farrago of earlier oral presentations, the author confesses.)
December 8, 2024
This book was written before the internet really existed too…shit is too bleak :/
May 13, 2025
Book needed a better editor.
Read
January 6, 2014Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom by Peter W. Huber
Cancer Caused by Trauma.
During the early twentieth century, when almost nothing was known about the causes of cancer, an effort was made to connect physical bodily trauma with cancer. Traumatic injuries at work that were soon followed by the detection of cancer near the site of the injury were thought to have a cause and effect relationship. They were the basis of workers’ compensation lawsuits, many of which were approved by judges.
Sudden Acceleration
In 1986, the television news program Sixty Minutes ran a report on the sudden acceleration of the Audi 5000 sedans that happened when the driver switched from park into reverse. They interviewed Alice Weinstein, founder of the Audi Victims Network. Audi lost a lot of sales. However, the problem also occurred in many other makes of cars: Honda, Buick, Pontiac, Mercedes. Several investigations showed that there was no fault in the automobile design or manufacturing. The problem was driver error: the driver thought he was stepping on the brake, but was actually stepping on the accelerator.
Cerebral Palsy and Obstetricians
Many patients and doctors use to think lack of oxygen during birth caused cerebral palsy (CP). So in the 1970s electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) of the baby’s heartbeat during delivery became popular. Cesarean sections were often performed when the baby was in distress. This electronic monitoring did little to reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy, but the paper charts produced by EFM were often used as evidence in lawsuits against obstetricians for babies born with cerebral palsy. Scientific research has shown that asphyxia during labors, forceps deliveries, maternal drug use, and family history are only weak risk factors for CP. And mistakes made by obstetricians during delivery are rarely a cause of CP.
Post-Huber Note: since this book was written in the 1990s, it has been found that infections during pregnancy are sometimes a cause of cerebral palsy, because the cytokines produced by the body in reaction to the infections are toxic to fetal brain.
Bendectine and Morning Sickness
Bendectine was a prescription drug treatment for hyperemesis gravida, a severe form of morning sickness. Earlier, in the late 1950s and early 1960s, an anti-nausea drug called thalidomide had been used for morning sickness and had been found to often produce serious birth defects. In 1961, Aussie pediatrician William McBride and German doctor Widukind Lenz had warned about thalidomide causing birth defects. The science proved them right. Now, in the 1980s, McBride was claiming that Bendectin caused birth defects. In 1983 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals pulled Bendectin from the American market, due to pressure from lawsuits. Later scientific research showed that Bendectine did not cause birth defects. Since then, pharmaceutical companies have stopped developing drugs for nausea during pregnancy, due to fear of law suits.
Cancer Caused by Trauma.
During the early twentieth century, when almost nothing was known about the causes of cancer, an effort was made to connect physical bodily trauma with cancer. Traumatic injuries at work that were soon followed by the detection of cancer near the site of the injury were thought to have a cause and effect relationship. They were the basis of workers’ compensation lawsuits, many of which were approved by judges.
Sudden Acceleration
In 1986, the television news program Sixty Minutes ran a report on the sudden acceleration of the Audi 5000 sedans that happened when the driver switched from park into reverse. They interviewed Alice Weinstein, founder of the Audi Victims Network. Audi lost a lot of sales. However, the problem also occurred in many other makes of cars: Honda, Buick, Pontiac, Mercedes. Several investigations showed that there was no fault in the automobile design or manufacturing. The problem was driver error: the driver thought he was stepping on the brake, but was actually stepping on the accelerator.
Cerebral Palsy and Obstetricians
Many patients and doctors use to think lack of oxygen during birth caused cerebral palsy (CP). So in the 1970s electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) of the baby’s heartbeat during delivery became popular. Cesarean sections were often performed when the baby was in distress. This electronic monitoring did little to reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy, but the paper charts produced by EFM were often used as evidence in lawsuits against obstetricians for babies born with cerebral palsy. Scientific research has shown that asphyxia during labors, forceps deliveries, maternal drug use, and family history are only weak risk factors for CP. And mistakes made by obstetricians during delivery are rarely a cause of CP.
Post-Huber Note: since this book was written in the 1990s, it has been found that infections during pregnancy are sometimes a cause of cerebral palsy, because the cytokines produced by the body in reaction to the infections are toxic to fetal brain.
Bendectine and Morning Sickness
Bendectine was a prescription drug treatment for hyperemesis gravida, a severe form of morning sickness. Earlier, in the late 1950s and early 1960s, an anti-nausea drug called thalidomide had been used for morning sickness and had been found to often produce serious birth defects. In 1961, Aussie pediatrician William McBride and German doctor Widukind Lenz had warned about thalidomide causing birth defects. The science proved them right. Now, in the 1980s, McBride was claiming that Bendectin caused birth defects. In 1983 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals pulled Bendectin from the American market, due to pressure from lawsuits. Later scientific research showed that Bendectine did not cause birth defects. Since then, pharmaceutical companies have stopped developing drugs for nausea during pregnancy, due to fear of law suits.
February 15, 2016
A polemic on the dangers of submitting scientific controversy to the court system, particularly where that leads to regulation via the courts. Regardless of anyone's stance on the issue, it raises weighty concerns and is worth reading.
December 29, 2012
This book would have been better if it was 50 pages shorter. There is much unnecessary repetition and metaphors drag on too long.
July 27, 2011
A complete and utter waste of time. Not even well written. For anyone else who started this book, thinking that the final chapters look interesting, don't bother finishing it.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews