What do you think?
Rate this book
A Shakespearian Grammar; An Attempt to Illustrate Some of the Differences Between Elizabethan and Modern English ; for the Use of Schools
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1874 edition. ...shall seem probable) every one of these accidents." " My honour's at the stake, which (danger) to defeat I must produce my power."--A. I/V. ii. 3. 156. 272. Which for " as to which." Hence which and "the which" are loosely used adverbially for "as to which." So in Latin, " quod" in " quod si." " Showers of blood, The which how far off from the mind of Bolingbroke lt is such crimson tempest should bedew," &c. Rich. 11. iii. 3. 45. " With unrestrained loose compani0ns----Even such, they say, as stand in narrow lanes, And beat our watch, and rob our passengers; Which he, young, wanton, and effeminate boy, Takes on the point of honour, to support So dissolute a crew."--Rich. 11. v. 3. 10. " But God be thanked for I/Vhich I in sutferance heartily will rejoice." Hm. V. 2. 159 273, Which. It is hard to explain the unless Which is used for the kindred " whether." In " My virtue or my plague, be it either which," Hamlet, iv. 7. 13. there is perhaps a. confusion between "be it either" and "be it whichever of the two. " Perhaps, however, " either" may be taken in its original sense of "one of the two," so that "either whic " is "which-one-so-ever of the two." " Who does the wolf love? The lamb. "--Coriol. ii. I. 8. Compare VV. 7: iv. 4.. 66, v. I. 109. Apparently it is not so common to omit the m when the whom is governed by a. preposition whose contiguity demands the " There is a mystery with whom relation Durst never meddle/'--Tr. and Cr. iii. 3. 201. Compare especially,...
94 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1901
7 people are currently reading
109 people want to read
About the author
Edwin A. Abbott
218 books834 followersPeople best know British theologian and writer Edwin Abbott Abbott for his imaginative satirical novella
Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions
(1884).
This English schoolmaster authored of the mathematical satire.
He was educated at the city of London school and at college of Saint John, Cambridge, where he as fellow took the highest honors in classics, mathematics, and theology. In 1862, he took orders. After holding masterships at school of king Edward, Birmingham, and at Clifton college, he succeeded G.F. Mortimer as headmaster of the City of London School in 1865 at the early age of 26 years. He was Hulsean lecturer in 1876.
He retired in 1889, and devoted himself to literary and theological pursuits. Liberal inclinations of Abbott in theology were prominent both in his educational views and in his books. His Shakespearian Grammar (1870) is a permanent contribution to English philology. In 1885 he published a life of Francis Bacon. His theological writings include three anonymously published religious romances - Philochristus (1878), Onesimus (1882), and Sitanus (1906).
More weighty contributions are the anonymous theological discussion The Kernel and the Husk (1886), Philomythus (1891), his book The Anglican Career of Cardinal Newman (1892), and his article "The Gospels" in the ninth edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica, embodying a critical view which caused considerable stir in the English theological world. He also wrote St Thomas of Canterbury, his Death and Miracles (1898), Johannine Vocabulary (1905), Johannine Grammar (1906). Flatland was published in 1884.
Sources that say he is the brother of Evelyn Abbott (1843 - 1901), who was a well-known tutor of Balliol College, Oxford, and author of a scholarly history of Greece, are in error.
This English schoolmaster authored of the mathematical satire.
He was educated at the city of London school and at college of Saint John, Cambridge, where he as fellow took the highest honors in classics, mathematics, and theology. In 1862, he took orders. After holding masterships at school of king Edward, Birmingham, and at Clifton college, he succeeded G.F. Mortimer as headmaster of the City of London School in 1865 at the early age of 26 years. He was Hulsean lecturer in 1876.
He retired in 1889, and devoted himself to literary and theological pursuits. Liberal inclinations of Abbott in theology were prominent both in his educational views and in his books. His Shakespearian Grammar (1870) is a permanent contribution to English philology. In 1885 he published a life of Francis Bacon. His theological writings include three anonymously published religious romances - Philochristus (1878), Onesimus (1882), and Sitanus (1906).
More weighty contributions are the anonymous theological discussion The Kernel and the Husk (1886), Philomythus (1891), his book The Anglican Career of Cardinal Newman (1892), and his article "The Gospels" in the ninth edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica, embodying a critical view which caused considerable stir in the English theological world. He also wrote St Thomas of Canterbury, his Death and Miracles (1898), Johannine Vocabulary (1905), Johannine Grammar (1906). Flatland was published in 1884.
Sources that say he is the brother of Evelyn Abbott (1843 - 1901), who was a well-known tutor of Balliol College, Oxford, and author of a scholarly history of Greece, are in error.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
May 23, 2008
Written by the man who wrote Flatland, this book not only helped me understand Shakespeare better, but now reading the King James Bible is a cakewalk.
December 10, 2017
This is not an easy book. It is technical. I feel that having read this volume I have a better understanding of the works of Shakespeare that I have already read, and a firmer foundation to continue my quest to read all of Shakespeare's works.
February 4, 2015
Anyone trying to read Shakespeare or watch the plays should read the Introduction to this book, which explains the general reasons for the differences between Elizabethan and modern (i.e. Victorian) English. The body of the book is very detailed, and would interest someone with an interest in language rather than the general reader. Since Elizabethan English is transitional between Middle English (Abbott uses the term Early English, and Anglo-Saxon for Old English) and the modern language, the book often shows the evolution from one to the other through Shakespeare's English, rather than just dealing with the English of Shakespeare's time.
I found some of the explanations fascinating, such as the origins of the prepositions, conjunctions and common adverbs (for example, "also" from all+so, an emphatic form of "so", which explains why it can mean "too" in English and "thus" in German; "much", "more" and "most" from mo+ch, mo+er and mo+est, great, greater, and greatest in quantity; "than" and "then" as different case forms of "that", originally used just the opposite of the way they are now). The book is arranged alphabetically by parts of speech, from adverbs to verbs; then ends with a discussion of Shakespeare's prosody. Each section is illustrated by quotations, mostly from Shakespeare but also from other Elizabethan writers such as Ben Jonson and Beaumont and Fletcher.
The book is in the tradition of classical philology, written before modern linguistics, so some things I am sure would be explained a little differently today. It was intended for High School students (!) and assumes that they will have a better knowledge of Greek and Latin grammar than of English grammar -- in fact, he begins with a defense of taking time out from the study of those languages for mere English (essentially, he claims knowing English grammar will help students to understand Latin better.) Some of the Elizabethan forms he discusses seem quite normal to me -- probably because American English has retained some Shakepearian constructions which have changed in British English.
I found some of the explanations fascinating, such as the origins of the prepositions, conjunctions and common adverbs (for example, "also" from all+so, an emphatic form of "so", which explains why it can mean "too" in English and "thus" in German; "much", "more" and "most" from mo+ch, mo+er and mo+est, great, greater, and greatest in quantity; "than" and "then" as different case forms of "that", originally used just the opposite of the way they are now). The book is arranged alphabetically by parts of speech, from adverbs to verbs; then ends with a discussion of Shakespeare's prosody. Each section is illustrated by quotations, mostly from Shakespeare but also from other Elizabethan writers such as Ben Jonson and Beaumont and Fletcher.
The book is in the tradition of classical philology, written before modern linguistics, so some things I am sure would be explained a little differently today. It was intended for High School students (!) and assumes that they will have a better knowledge of Greek and Latin grammar than of English grammar -- in fact, he begins with a defense of taking time out from the study of those languages for mere English (essentially, he claims knowing English grammar will help students to understand Latin better.) Some of the Elizabethan forms he discusses seem quite normal to me -- probably because American English has retained some Shakepearian constructions which have changed in British English.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews