Ethics
I've been meaning to read this since high school. Obviously, it was too dense for me at that time. And even now it was difficult. It is definitely better suited for study in college with guidance of a professor than as an evening read. Nonetheless, I enjoyed the challenge. At first, I trie to take notes, but that slowed me down far too much to my liking. So I just read and gleaned what I could. I'll only make one comment on the content. There is no doubt that behaving "ethically" is all about self-control. And here I look around at society and realize we have almost none. A man's word is rarely good anymore; everyone seems to spill their feelings and thoughts regardless of consequences. It is seldom one meets anyone whose central goal is to be a "good" person. Yet… Aristotle complained of the same thing.
Politics
How can I write on such a book, or any work of philosophy in such a small space? Philosophy, political philosophy being no exception is quite dense. This is especially true when the work is supposed to be a summary of an entire field. Aristotle here gives his view of first the nature of society, man in society, the proper end of a society ("end" or "purpose" being his primary concern in all his teaching), and thus the means to achieve. He of course could only take what the world had seen up to that point. His analysis of the types of government (monarchy/tyranny; aristocracy/oligarchy; polity/democracy) is stil poignant and accurate today, though when reading, it is important to pay attention to his definition of these forms as they are different from their modern, common ones in some key aspects. The biggest flow of his analysis, is of course, the belief on who should be citizens and thus participants in government, as it follows from a belief that there are those born to rule and those born to be subject, and that the working class can not obtain virtue. Then again, he was born before Christ.