Logic: Inductive and Deductive

by William Minto

Inductive and Deductive is a comprehensive book written by William Minto that explores the principles of logical reasoning. The book covers both inductive and deductive reasoning, which are two fundamental methods of reasoning used in various fields such as science, mathematics, philosophy, and law.The book begins by introducing the basic concepts of logic and the importance of reasoning in various aspects of life. It then delves into the principles of inductive reasoning, which involves drawing conclusions based on observations and evidence. The author explains the different types of inductive reasoning, such as analogy, generalization, and causal inference, and provides examples to illustrate each type.The book then moves on to the principles of deductive reasoning, which involves drawing conclusions based on established premises. The author explains the different types of deductive reasoning, such as syllogism and conditional reasoning, and provides examples to illustrate each type.Throughout the book, the author emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and the need to evaluate arguments and evidence carefully. The book also covers topics such as fallacies, the scientific method, and the role of logic in decision making.Overall, Inductive and Deductive is a valuable resource for anyone interested in improving their reasoning skills and understanding the principles of logical thinking. The book is written in a clear and concise manner, making it accessible to both beginners and advanced readers.1894. With a few diagrams. Minto writes in the In this little treatise two things are attempted that at first might appear incompatible. One of them is to put the study of logical formulae on a historical basis. The other aim, which might at first appear inconsistent with this, is to increase the power of Logic as a practical discipline.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

Genres: Nonfiction, Logic, Philosophy

386 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1893

About the author

Scottish academic, journalist, novelist, critic and editor.

Reviews

[Adrienna · Rating 2 out of 5]

I received the Kindle version for FREE, but only shows paperback version available on here.

I was hoping this book would help with logic reasoning on LSAT and that you will need this skill in law school; but just starting the book...seems to be out of scope for me. I'll review and see if it can help any...definitely not a resource for this.

This book is written in Old English (archaic) but still able to review; refers to Greek philosophers like Socrates and Aristotle, then also laws of thought, etc. but liked the bias on these various laws introduced and also seeing the fallacies of principles. Overall, I found myself skimming through the logic and reasoning proposed.

Since I was considering to go to law school and taking the LSAT in October, I wanted to see if I can grasp some enlightenment on the material at hand. The first few chapters were quite daunting, abstract, and Old English writing which made it a bore. However, when I skimmed to the end, there was some brief insight on formal logic that is used when prepping for LSAT, also plurality of causes as well as alternative possibility of causation, and to look upon hypothesis and analogies when dealing with probable cause (or certain type of cases especially criminal related). Only this part had my senses stirring and got light insight as a whole. This may be a resource in the future, who knows.

Overall, this book wasn't what I was expecting but for FREE who could complain.

2 stars (okay read but yet not your typical or easy read).


Adrienna Turner
Author of ten books.
www.adriennaturner.webs.com

[Olena · Rating 4 out of 5]

Читаючи, ніби готуєшся до суперечок, диспутів. Вчишся мислити логічно і послідовно. Логіка є для того щоб уникнути омани. «Це практична наука, яка має справу з природою думки і способами іі вираження».
Проте напрошується питання навіщо розчленовувати мислення на складові? Такий логічний аналіз, скажімо, афоризмів або блукаючих істин у якості вправи видається доцільним. Це дозволить критичніше сприймати різні крилаті вислови, загальноприйняті твердження.
Взагалі доволі складно для сприйняття, доводиться напружено вловлювати зміст.
Виникла думка, що різні суперечки, намагання довести свою точку зору є для пошуку істини. І якщо, за законом логіки, є істинне твердження, то виходить істину можна знайти, вона пізнавана. Тобто філософи античності успішно знаходили, а значить знали істину.
Цікавим є місце логіки, індукціі в розвитку науковоі думки. Бо скажімо, коли читаєш усі ці буквенні позначення понять, то зовсім нецікаво і складно.
Виникло розуміння що ж це таке є дослідження у науці. Насамперед це розумова праця, логіка - виявлення причин, побудова гіпотез і іх доведення.
Думаю, що вміння виявляти причинно-наслідковий зв‘язок було б корисне багатьом.