I know, I 19m disgustingly pretentious, but I read this one in French in the hopes of picking up a bit of vocabulary (I now know how to deny that a woman hanged herself, how to accuse someone of wearing a disguise, and how to suck up to aristocrats. At least, I 19ll understand it when I read it). The writing style was simple and repetitive enough to comprehend without much dictionary-drudging, and the stories were comfortably short enough that any misunderstandings didn 19t inconvenience for long.
It took me by surprise that the eponymous character wasn 19t the central narrator. Instead you have Mr. Satterthwaite, the suitably pompous, unbearably formal and forever incredulous part-time investigator. By the third short story, I had built up a pretty credible theory that Mr. Quinn (aka. Harley Quin, aka. 18harlequin 19. Ha. Ha.) was nothing but a complex figment of a schizophrenic imagination whose sole role was to bump into the protagonist in random places and hand him clues to his mysteries, ones that he no doubt knew all along. I thought it gave the otherwise overly formulaic story a more interesting, more sinister edge, but then Agatha Christie had to ruin my pet theory by allowing the phantom to interact with other, saner characters. Regardless it was quite a satisfying read, not least of which because I felt a pleasant pang of delight every time I managed an entire paragraph without puzzling over any new words. There was another kind of puzzling to be done with this tidy cluster of interrelated mysteries though, and these puzzles were actually possible to untangle without the help of an annoyingly omniscient, last-minute-mystery-unveiling consulting detective. Enough clues are benevolently handed down throughout the story and left to be pieced together at leisure, which is what I consider a hallmark of a good mystery novel.
My main grievance against this collection of short stories is that a good half of it is pure pleasantry, consisting of either stiffly formal flattery or nauseatingly passionate flummery. Here is Christie 19s patented formula for opening a scene: new character enters, an eloquent, emotive description follows, then Mr. Satterthwaite flounders in with his usual handful of complements, the new character responds with the usual embarrassed/delighted denials, this goes on for about a page or two (it 19s surprising that old little Mr. Satterthwaite never succeeds in getting into anyone 19s pants; he seems to be trying very ardently), and at last some mystery unveils. If the new character isn 19t the victim, then you can probably be sure that they 19re the perpetrator.
Despite how affected the protagonist is by all the beautiful, cultured and elegant people he surrounds himself with, he doesn 19t seem particularly touched by their untimely deaths. To him, they appear to be nothing more than props for his mysteries. (He isn 19t an investigator by trade, by the way, he just stumbles into locked room murder scenes every other week.) Sure, he might mourn the pretty hanged woman, and eloquently compare her to a majestic peacock, even as she hangs from the rafters, but he puts it all behind him disturbingly quickly. That was actually one of the points in my theory regarding his mental instability.
This was my first Agatha Christie novel, and I 19m sure it won 19t be my last. Though next time, I think I 19ll stick to English or I 19ll overweigh my vocab with a disquieting amount of grisly, bloody words; ones I 19d rather not have to explain when I let them slip into conversation in a tourist office.