To use a time honoured cliche, I really wanted to like this book. I ordered it enthusiastically from Amazon and waited eagerly for it to arrive. Unfortunately it was not quite what I expected. That is not the writer’s fault of course, but I need to review honestly for anyone who might make the same mistake as I did.
This is not a light, easy, dip into read nor is it badly executed. It is a learned, exhaustive and highly factual dissertation that compares conditions and training of women pilots in Great Britain and the USA. The first quarter of the book is pretty heavy going. I often read at night when there are fewer distractions, sometimes I will read a book cover to cover, others I will get sleepy after a chapter or two. In the case of this book, the early chapters were so dry that I could not read more than a page or two without giving up. It is factually dense and very critical of the way women were treated in the USA and makes no attempt to pull you in to any sort of narrative in the early chapters. Having said this, the book gets better as it moves away from dry facts, figures and a personal critique of Jacqueline Cochran’s organisational failings with WASP . It improves when it begins to focus on the wartime flying tasks women actually undertook. It is at its best when the author lets the women themselves tell their stories. That anecdotal approach is what I hoped I was buying in the first place. It comes to life in the later chapters.
Often one of the hardest things to do, I find, is to review totally dispassionately. When you accord a rating to a book it is sometimes appropriate to consider the audience it may have been intended for as well as any personal impressions. It became obvious that I needed something more people orientated and less fact based. A historian might well find the direct opposite, so for me the final rating takes this into account and the fact that the book is extremely well researched is obvious. I would recommend this book to the military historian or feminist who is also interested in women’s roles in a time of war. I would think twice about recommending it to a casual reader.