What a wonderful idea for a book. I really enjoyed James Scott's chapter in particular -- a crusader for interdisciplinary studies (reminds me of Professor G in history). His interview is brutally honest, straightforward and funny. Other interviews are also great materials for historicizing the field of political science. Knowing the personal and social background of each scholar helps us enjoy and appreciate their works. All comparative majors and anyone who is interested in American postwar intellectuals will love this book. The mutual perceptions between teachers and students are fascinating (e.g. Almond thought the special terms he invented were so widely accepted that they did not require any footnotes or further explanations but when James Scott took Almond's class Scott counted a (big) number of terms he could not understand!). Two things I learned from this book: 1. Not many of them wrote a good dissertation (or published it). 2. We Should Ask Important Questions (rather than bogged down in methodological innovations)
I am going through the first 100 pages for the abundance of questions in my own passion and specific interest. It feels good to get feeling of talking to James Scott nor Huntington through the papers. I have not found a way to what I want but I could tell things that I don't. Hopefully, it is a good start!