I am not typically inclined to write reviews however I want to forewarn potential readers of this book that I found it very difficult to finish and enjoy due to very flowery and nonsense language. Here are some examples:
Describing the 5th symphony “If we try to imagine the movement as transporting us from a combat zone to the mass graves of dead children or soldiers, via several kinds of no man's land, it very quickly takes us even further than that, soaring to cosmic proportions. It is fear, dread and imagination run riot, loosed into infinite space and terror, simultaneously chaotic and meticulously organized.”
Describing the 6th “In this symphony, we can be viewing a mountaintop vista, recalling or anticipating a sumptuous summer amid the alpine peaks and meadows, or suddenly being flattened underfoot by the obstinate tread of a thousand spiteful boots - but still the symphony maintains its ruthlessly calm management and poise. We stagger and flounder from emotional crisis to happy revelation, poignant reflection to wretched emergency…Cowbells, earlier an emblem of escape, liberty and clarity, are cast as forlorn faith, desolate references to another world amid the howling emotional tornado and general ride into abyss. Yet, more positively, the cowbells also serve to spiritually link the movements together, showing how even the most remorseless angular existences can claim their smooth-edged calm, however forsaken and remote.”
“The scherzo's music often retains its dance spirit but is persistently traumatized by the march's influence, re-orchestrating parts of the first movement into satanic ghostly rituals and sonic torture chambers. The horrific nature of the movement plays with time: it seems both neoteric, a devilish child-killer teasing with his toys, and well as a depressingly Familiar, antiquated sense of brutality and abuse - Herod,
Nero, Fu Sheng.”
Describing the 9th: “Mahler's last completed symphony is a marvellously constructed network of agony and longing, mockery and veneration, resilience and resignation, inviting us, by its close, to experience the enigmatic space between sound and silence. Throughout, it maintains a revolving core of darkness and light, sometimes holding secrets invisible to others, but generally wearing its sincerity as a symphonic badge of honour. It induces both claustrophobia and agoraphobia, challenging us to locate meaning or stability amid its prisons and vistas.
It stares death in the face and refuses to blink, while searing suffering onto the inner ear. It yearns for lost time and lost love. It sometimes seems obsessed with the past, with memory with a fervid desire to project all history, both personal and universal, musical and non-musical, into infinity.”
If this type of nonsense appeals to you, you will really enjoy this book because it is littered with hundreds of examples of this type of writing. I could barely stomach it. It is unfortunate because between the authors diatribes such as the above, there is actually some useful and descriptive biography.
If this type of nonsense doesn’t appeal to you, fortunately the book is organized such that you can just skip the authors descriptions of Mahlers works and enjoy the biography in between.