What do you think?
Rate this book
Nothing To Fear: Alfred Hitchcock And The Wrong Men
In 1956, Alfred Hitchcock focused his lens on an issue that cuts to the heart of our
criminal justice system: the risk of wrongful conviction. The result was The Wrong Man, a bracing drama based on the real-life false arrest of Queens musician Christopher “ Manny” Balestrero. Manny's ordeal is part of a larger story of other miscarriages of justice in the first half of the twentieth century. Attorney Jason Isralowitz tells this story in a revelatory book that situates both the Balestrero case and its cinematic counterpart in their historical context. Drawing from archival records, Isralowitz delivers a gripping account of Manny’ s trial and new insights into an errant prosecution. He then examines how Hitchcock’ s film bears witness to issues that animate the contemporary innocence movement. Given the hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted in recent years, this genre-bending work of true crime and film history is a must-read.
criminal justice system: the risk of wrongful conviction. The result was The Wrong Man, a bracing drama based on the real-life false arrest of Queens musician Christopher “ Manny” Balestrero. Manny's ordeal is part of a larger story of other miscarriages of justice in the first half of the twentieth century. Attorney Jason Isralowitz tells this story in a revelatory book that situates both the Balestrero case and its cinematic counterpart in their historical context. Drawing from archival records, Isralowitz delivers a gripping account of Manny’ s trial and new insights into an errant prosecution. He then examines how Hitchcock’ s film bears witness to issues that animate the contemporary innocence movement. Given the hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted in recent years, this genre-bending work of true crime and film history is a must-read.
- GenresNonfictionTrue CrimeFilm
262 pages, Paperback
First published January 14, 2023
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
December 13, 2022
"Each of us has at one time or another been wrongly blamed for something we were innocent of." Alfred Hitchcock made many films featuring wrongly accused protagonists. "Hitchcock's canon-his films usually follow a pattern of the innocent man who gets involved in bizarre situations...Hitchcock's police often hastily reach the wrong conclusion about the hero...are just as bad at unmasking the guilty...their mistakes are tied to eyewitness misidentification." Hitchcock's film, The Wrong Man is arguably an overlooked gem, a true story told "from the point of view of the person who underwent this ordeal."
The year was 1953. Manny Balestrero, a quiet, gentle soul, was a Queens musician who played upright bass in a rhumba band in New York's Stork Club. He lived in Jackson Heights with his wife, Rose and two young sons. On January 13, 1953, Manny visited the offices of Prudential Insurance with Rose's life insurance policy in hand. He needed to ascertain how much he could borrow against the policy for Rose's wisdom teeth extraction.
"That's the man who robbed our office," whispered the employee examining Rose's policy. She fearfully shared her views with several others. Manny was picked up, later that evening, by police detectives. He was not told why. "An innocent man had nothing to fear." A showup was arranged in several stores where robberies had been committed. Manny was told to walk to the back of each store, turn and exit the store. This was a recipe for a presumption of guilt. Brought to the 110th Police Precinct, a faulty lineup with prejudicial identification procedures would ensue. Manny's arrest was sealed when he made a "spelling" mistake while recreating a copy of the holdup note.
The Wrong Man was "one of the most important movies about criminal justice ever made. By capturing the realities of the legal system of the day, Hitchcock and his team, opened a window into New York's history of wrongful convictions...Hitchcock's immediate subject was a single false arrest." "The file shows how the routines of law enforcement transformed eyewitness mistakes into a miscarriage of justice."
Strategically placed in a lineup and viewed by Prudential Insurance employees who stood side by side, Manny was identified based upon mob mentality. When one was unsure, she was influenced by her co-worker thereby making a positive identification. The police had tunnel vision. Fixating on Manny, they "select and filter the evidence that will 'build a case' for conviction..." They use confirmation bias and make a rush to judgement. The prosecution violate their duty to protect Manny's innocence.
Unimaginable family difficulties immerged as a result of false accusation. "Before her husband's arrest, Rose presided over the household with a steady hand...Rose's behavior changed soon after...[with Rose becoming] increasingly withdrawn and unresponsive."
"Not until decades after The Wrong Man's release was the unreliability of eyewitness identification more widely recognized...the protection of the innocent requires searching scrutiny of accusations...". "People have a naive faith in the power of their own innocence to set them free." In Manny's case, the adoption of Miranda Rights was still far into the future (1966). There was no DNA at that time. The newly formed Innocence Project, now helps to exonerate falsely accused and/or imprisoned individuals.
In "Nothing To Fear: Alfred Hitchcock And The Wrong Men" by Jason Isralowitz, Manny Balestrero's true case comes to light. Enhancing the narrative are photos of the real Manny as well as photos from Hitchcock's movie. Author Isralowitz introduces legal cases, as well, that precede the Belestrero arrest, documenting other miscarriages of justice. This very informative, fascinating read of true crime is one I highly recommend.
Thank you Fayetteville Mafia Press and Net Galley for the ARC in exchange for an honest review.
The year was 1953. Manny Balestrero, a quiet, gentle soul, was a Queens musician who played upright bass in a rhumba band in New York's Stork Club. He lived in Jackson Heights with his wife, Rose and two young sons. On January 13, 1953, Manny visited the offices of Prudential Insurance with Rose's life insurance policy in hand. He needed to ascertain how much he could borrow against the policy for Rose's wisdom teeth extraction.
"That's the man who robbed our office," whispered the employee examining Rose's policy. She fearfully shared her views with several others. Manny was picked up, later that evening, by police detectives. He was not told why. "An innocent man had nothing to fear." A showup was arranged in several stores where robberies had been committed. Manny was told to walk to the back of each store, turn and exit the store. This was a recipe for a presumption of guilt. Brought to the 110th Police Precinct, a faulty lineup with prejudicial identification procedures would ensue. Manny's arrest was sealed when he made a "spelling" mistake while recreating a copy of the holdup note.
The Wrong Man was "one of the most important movies about criminal justice ever made. By capturing the realities of the legal system of the day, Hitchcock and his team, opened a window into New York's history of wrongful convictions...Hitchcock's immediate subject was a single false arrest." "The file shows how the routines of law enforcement transformed eyewitness mistakes into a miscarriage of justice."
Strategically placed in a lineup and viewed by Prudential Insurance employees who stood side by side, Manny was identified based upon mob mentality. When one was unsure, she was influenced by her co-worker thereby making a positive identification. The police had tunnel vision. Fixating on Manny, they "select and filter the evidence that will 'build a case' for conviction..." They use confirmation bias and make a rush to judgement. The prosecution violate their duty to protect Manny's innocence.
Unimaginable family difficulties immerged as a result of false accusation. "Before her husband's arrest, Rose presided over the household with a steady hand...Rose's behavior changed soon after...[with Rose becoming] increasingly withdrawn and unresponsive."
"Not until decades after The Wrong Man's release was the unreliability of eyewitness identification more widely recognized...the protection of the innocent requires searching scrutiny of accusations...". "People have a naive faith in the power of their own innocence to set them free." In Manny's case, the adoption of Miranda Rights was still far into the future (1966). There was no DNA at that time. The newly formed Innocence Project, now helps to exonerate falsely accused and/or imprisoned individuals.
In "Nothing To Fear: Alfred Hitchcock And The Wrong Men" by Jason Isralowitz, Manny Balestrero's true case comes to light. Enhancing the narrative are photos of the real Manny as well as photos from Hitchcock's movie. Author Isralowitz introduces legal cases, as well, that precede the Belestrero arrest, documenting other miscarriages of justice. This very informative, fascinating read of true crime is one I highly recommend.
Thank you Fayetteville Mafia Press and Net Galley for the ARC in exchange for an honest review.
May 3, 2023
A fascinating, expertly researched study of one of Alfred Hitchcock's lesser-known and underrated films "THE WRONG MAN." This 1957* film, Hitchcock's only true-crime film, starred Henry Fonda as Manny Balestrero, a naive New York musician who is wrongly accused of robbery, resulting in harrowing persecution by the justice system and the mental breakdown suffered by his wife Rose, played by Vera Miles.
"But 'The Wrong Man' has broader claims for the attention of current and future audiences. It roots the universal theme of false accusation in the details of one family's experience. It exposes the disturbing mob mentality that has doomed many suspects. It shows how authorities can be too credulous about eyewitness identifications and too quick to presume guilt. And it reveals that law enforcement routines can be just as destructive of innocent lives as corruption.
"In telling Manny's story, 'The Wrong Man' testifies to the experience of multiple generations of criminal defendants who became victims of a flawed justice system - a story that New York's legal institutions effectively suppressed. We can get a much better sense of what led to wrongful convictions from Hitchcock than from the New York State Judicial Council's 1948 study on erroneous identifications.
"At the same time, 'The Wrong Man' was groundbreaking in its depiction of the spiral devastation that comes with false arrest. Its haunting depiction of Rose's ordeal shows that the wrongful incarceration imperils not just the defendant, but their loved ones. Hitchcock paid serious attention to the family trauma even as the court system resisted recognizing it." ...... Jason Isralowitz's conclusion, page 194 of "Nothing to Fear."
Book is basically broken up into three parts:
- Those Who Suffered Before - a study of similar victims wrongfully accused of mistaken identity and some that suffered in prison for years before being cleared.
- People v. Balestrero - the actual case study, thoroughly summarized by the author who as a real-life Manhattan lawyer offers his own expertise.
- The Wrong Man - a detailed study of the Hitchcock film with a solid summary of Hitchcock's preparation and research, the actors and screenwriters Maxwell Anderson and Angus MacPhail who adapted Herbert Brean's original LIFE magazine article.
From my impression, an impeccably researched book (if a little heavy going at times) regarding an important and still very relevant modern-day subject and a film which deserves to be rediscovered and appreciated by many more viewers.
With black and white illustrations from past cases, the Balestrero arrest and trial and stills from the film; and an extensive 30 pages of notes.
And compliments to the publisher, obviously a small-time press, for the excellent layout and more importantly, I found no errors or faulty grammar in the type - wish I could say the same for all the publications from large-scale publishers I read!
* Shot in 1956 and released briefly the same year, film is generally listed as a 1957 film.
"But 'The Wrong Man' has broader claims for the attention of current and future audiences. It roots the universal theme of false accusation in the details of one family's experience. It exposes the disturbing mob mentality that has doomed many suspects. It shows how authorities can be too credulous about eyewitness identifications and too quick to presume guilt. And it reveals that law enforcement routines can be just as destructive of innocent lives as corruption.
"In telling Manny's story, 'The Wrong Man' testifies to the experience of multiple generations of criminal defendants who became victims of a flawed justice system - a story that New York's legal institutions effectively suppressed. We can get a much better sense of what led to wrongful convictions from Hitchcock than from the New York State Judicial Council's 1948 study on erroneous identifications.
"At the same time, 'The Wrong Man' was groundbreaking in its depiction of the spiral devastation that comes with false arrest. Its haunting depiction of Rose's ordeal shows that the wrongful incarceration imperils not just the defendant, but their loved ones. Hitchcock paid serious attention to the family trauma even as the court system resisted recognizing it." ...... Jason Isralowitz's conclusion, page 194 of "Nothing to Fear."
Book is basically broken up into three parts:
- Those Who Suffered Before - a study of similar victims wrongfully accused of mistaken identity and some that suffered in prison for years before being cleared.
- People v. Balestrero - the actual case study, thoroughly summarized by the author who as a real-life Manhattan lawyer offers his own expertise.
- The Wrong Man - a detailed study of the Hitchcock film with a solid summary of Hitchcock's preparation and research, the actors and screenwriters Maxwell Anderson and Angus MacPhail who adapted Herbert Brean's original LIFE magazine article.
From my impression, an impeccably researched book (if a little heavy going at times) regarding an important and still very relevant modern-day subject and a film which deserves to be rediscovered and appreciated by many more viewers.
With black and white illustrations from past cases, the Balestrero arrest and trial and stills from the film; and an extensive 30 pages of notes.
And compliments to the publisher, obviously a small-time press, for the excellent layout and more importantly, I found no errors or faulty grammar in the type - wish I could say the same for all the publications from large-scale publishers I read!
* Shot in 1956 and released briefly the same year, film is generally listed as a 1957 film.
January 16, 2023
This was such a great book about those arrested and convicted dude to eyewitnesses who erroneously claim victims to be perpetrators just like an Alfred Hitchcock‘s film the wrong man in many other films by the great director. Most of the book or stories that haven’t been told before and some kids of quickly and some not so quickly but all seem to have a ripple effect where even though one person goes to jail to family members that person suffer. From mental breakdowns to Panera to destitution due to trying to help the convicted much much more. This is such an interesting book if you love True Crime in truth saving the day you’ll love this book not all stories are saved in time to is not ruined the accused life but they are still all worth reading. What a great book I totally enjoyed it I think it said this happens put books like this that will get it on peoples radar and hopefully change things. I received the book from NetGalley and the publisher but I’m leaving this review voluntarily please forgive any mistakes as I am blind and dictate my review.
January 20, 2023
In Nothing to Fear Jason Isralowitz presents a wonderful blend of legal history and film analysis that highlights an area of the US "justice" system that has, fortunately, been of more interest in recent years: convictions of innocent people.
The close examination of the actual trial and conviction of Manny Balestrero is fascinating in its own right. This is an excellent example of the many weaknesses in our system of law, particularly criminal law. From police who are more concerned with getting an arrest and conviction to prosecutors who focus on their conviction rates rather than pesky little things like destroying a human being's life for professional gain.
While some of the practices have been eliminated or modified to make them less error prone, the fact remains that eyewitness testimony is, by nature, fuzzy. Even without the benefit of the vast body of research that has been done since this case, one can't pretend the police and the prosecutors were ignorant of the fallacies in their methods. What they did, they did knowing what the outcomes would be. The types of walkthroughs, the types of lineups, the grouping of witnesses together to insure consistent accounts, these were all accepted and tainted procedures.
The film analysis tends toward a contextualization and a look at how certain scenes reflect the issues Hitchcock was trying to highlight. In other words, this is a deep dive, don't be misled, but the type of deep dive you'd find in an interdisciplinary course, not a film course. This makes sense since this is about both the film and the actual case, and the film was not a groundbreaking film as far as technique is concerned. A very well-made film, but one where the story and message is front and center, not filmic bells and whistles.
Recommended for those interested in legal history and where it intersects with popular culture. Also those who need or want to broaden their idea of how to analyze film from basic technique to how it can reflect as well as influence (or at least try) society.
Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via NetGalley.
The close examination of the actual trial and conviction of Manny Balestrero is fascinating in its own right. This is an excellent example of the many weaknesses in our system of law, particularly criminal law. From police who are more concerned with getting an arrest and conviction to prosecutors who focus on their conviction rates rather than pesky little things like destroying a human being's life for professional gain.
While some of the practices have been eliminated or modified to make them less error prone, the fact remains that eyewitness testimony is, by nature, fuzzy. Even without the benefit of the vast body of research that has been done since this case, one can't pretend the police and the prosecutors were ignorant of the fallacies in their methods. What they did, they did knowing what the outcomes would be. The types of walkthroughs, the types of lineups, the grouping of witnesses together to insure consistent accounts, these were all accepted and tainted procedures.
The film analysis tends toward a contextualization and a look at how certain scenes reflect the issues Hitchcock was trying to highlight. In other words, this is a deep dive, don't be misled, but the type of deep dive you'd find in an interdisciplinary course, not a film course. This makes sense since this is about both the film and the actual case, and the film was not a groundbreaking film as far as technique is concerned. A very well-made film, but one where the story and message is front and center, not filmic bells and whistles.
Recommended for those interested in legal history and where it intersects with popular culture. Also those who need or want to broaden their idea of how to analyze film from basic technique to how it can reflect as well as influence (or at least try) society.
Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via NetGalley.
January 3, 2023
The book had a lot of interesting points, but I felt that the book had some issues. The book's narrative often diverted from what I thought was the central premise - a deeper look at the movie The Wrong Man. While the points made in the book's first half (or so) did have a role in such a discussion, it was unclear what those points were at times since their relevance was not really discussed in relation to the movie until Part 3. On that same point, because the movie was not discussed at length until Part 3, it felt that the book was more of a critique of the NY criminal justice system than a discussion of The Wrong Man.
Second, the book appeared unorganized. Throughout the book, there were many times that the same point was made three or more times since the points that were trying to be made were scattered throughout the book. If this book was organized more by points to be made, I feel that the book would have been an easier read to follow.
Second, the book appeared unorganized. Throughout the book, there were many times that the same point was made three or more times since the points that were trying to be made were scattered throughout the book. If this book was organized more by points to be made, I feel that the book would have been an easier read to follow.
October 30, 2022
3.5 bumped up. Interesting quick read about one of Hitchcock's lesser known films. Part one of the book details several wrongly convicted men (and women) of crimes ranging from forgery to murder. And how witness testimony got these innocents imprisoned. The main one being the subject of 1956's docudrama "The Wrong Man," musician Manny Balestrero, played by Henry Fonda. The film also includes the plight of Manny's wife Rose (Vera Miles). The book notes Hitchcock was always toying with the wrong man theme in his films and wanted to make a movie from the innocent man's perspective and not some outsider trying to get him (or her) out of prison. Not a bad read and excellent for Hitchcock fan's libraries.
January 31, 2023
I voluntarily read and reviewed an advanced copy of Nothing to Fear by Jason Isralowitz. All thoughts and opinions are my own. Thanks to NetGalley and Fayetteville Mafia Press for this ARC.
Reading the synopsis, I expected the book to be false confessions as seen through cinema. That isn't what I got. Instead, it focused on the history of using confessions when convicting criminals in New York. Especially in situations where people were falsely accused. Also, how the procedures changed throughout time. I found these stories extremely interesting and don't regret reading the book. It just wasn't exactly what I was expecting. I give this book 3.5/5 stars. If you are interested in True Crime then give it a read, if you are more of a cinephile, maybe skip it.
Reading the synopsis, I expected the book to be false confessions as seen through cinema. That isn't what I got. Instead, it focused on the history of using confessions when convicting criminals in New York. Especially in situations where people were falsely accused. Also, how the procedures changed throughout time. I found these stories extremely interesting and don't regret reading the book. It just wasn't exactly what I was expecting. I give this book 3.5/5 stars. If you are interested in True Crime then give it a read, if you are more of a cinephile, maybe skip it.
January 2, 2024
If you love Hitchcock, this is a must. Compelling and touching.
January 25, 2023
Great read. This a well organized book where the first half covers 5 cases where individuals were wrongly accused based on biased/unscientific witness identifications. The last case covered is the premise for the 2nd half of the book which is about Manny Balestrerò and the Hitchcock movie "The Wrong Man" .
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews