It is important to note that the majority of the themes explored in this book deal with sensitive subject matters. My review, therefore, touches on these topics as well. Many people might find the subject matters of the book as well as those detailed in my review overwhelming. I would suggest you steer clear of both if this is the case. Please note that from this point forward I will be writing about matters which contain reflections on the self-mutilation of a minor, absent parental figure, financial insecurity, a minor’s inappropriate encounter with an adult, & others.
Agatha Anxious is introduced to the reader on the eve of her 13th birthday; a nervous girl who expresses herself in a gloomy fashion, preferring to spend time amongst the cold tombstones of the local cemetery rather than with other children her age. Yet, on the eve of her teenage birthday, Agatha is gifted her first ghost. As a Perceiver, she is introduced to the mysteriously intertwined realities of the living & the dead. The adventure that takes Agatha far from home in the middle of the night will require her to form a bond with Leopold Panic as they manoeuvre through the grasps of unpleasant apparitions whose sole intent is to hold them back from freeing the souls of the unheard entities that wander the earth.
This is a book that is for children & that is why I will be highlighting why I included some of the content warnings that were listed at the beginning of this review. Firstly, Agatha is someone who exhibits high levels of anxiety which reveal themselves through her ripping her own skin from her fingers to the point in which she bleeds. McDowell saw fit to include this facet of Agatha’s character in the book as an indicator that she is a Perceiver, as all Perceivers have nervous habits—Leopold folds his hair, Dorian Doom sways on his feet—-which is not necessarily, in & of itself, a negative aspect. It is often beneficial for children to see themselves reflected within plots so as to gather strength alongside the characters.
Many children exhibit behavioural tendencies that see them performing actions that result in negative consequences on their own bodies. Picking at the skin on one's fingers is a very common practice amongst anxiety-ridden children. Yet, to continuously describe the peeling of flesh & bleeding of body members in such a casual way moves this book into a category that is not necessarily for younger audiences.
I believe that the inclusion of such behaviour could be brought forward in a way that does not necessarily hold the gore of the entire novel in a few sentences. Reading about Agatha peeling skin from her hands during bouts of heightened anxiety makes me feel very sad for her given that no one around her seems to know how to approach this behaviour appropriately. Her Aunt Hattie tells her she will never move past mutilating herself because that is part of being a Perceiver. In this same breath, we read about the character of Lucius Nikolai who is described as being over 200 years old & cuts Agatha’s fingers with his nails & then places her fingers in his mouth, sucking the blood from her hand.
I appreciate that this character was meant to represent a vampiric entity of sorts but the descriptors of such a character were done with great subtlety & without verbal indicators to differentiate him from any of the others. Therefore, reading about young Agatha sitting alone in his home whilst he sucks on her fingers made me greatly uncomfortable. I can imagine that a young reader might be led to wonder at what Lucious Nikolai was—how can a person live for 200 years? Had McDowell crafted this character in a more distinguished fashion we might see him represented as the ghoulish fiend of the monster world rather than represented as an elderly man who performs gross actions as ‘payment’ for information.
The plot of this book holds much intrigue & having been a young person who devoured books of all kinds, once upon a time, I can appreciate that there is a multitude of readers making their way into the literary world. However, this book fails at identifying a reader. This is not to say that books should necessarily be restricted to us based on our ages but, there are subject matters that will be explored more tenderly for younger readers so as to introduce them kindly; opening the door to discussions & information. Much of the dialogue utilized in this book felt overly mature for someone who would be around Agatha’s age (13) yet, we often saw this character acting in a variety of polarizing ways which led me to question who this book was for.
Agatha is written as being a very meek & mild young girl. She knows what she enjoys but she is going through life without much parental guidance given that both her parents work long hours to provide the basics of life care to Agatha & when they are home they are all but distracted, often keeping behind the closed door to their bedroom. Having grown up in the 90s I recognize that much literature of the time saw fit to have the parents neglect their children or behave in ways which saw them express exasperation with their presence. What year does this story take place? It would make sense for young Agatha to be wandering around at all hours of the night & day if this story took place during a period in time when her parents didn’t feel the need to worry about the other adults in the town, or those rolling through.
There are no set features within the book to highlight when this story is taking place which leads to many of Agatha’s actions feeling a bit disjointed. Her family refers to ‘the War’ in which Uncle Tim was killed & within the cemetery we see the young protagonists clearly reading plates from 1914. Aunt Hattie has an old TV but we don’t know if Agatha is watching movies on a VHS or a DVD. We don’t know which War Uncle Tim was killed in & we don’t have any set ages for any of the adults in the book to gauge when the story is taking place. All we know for sure is that Lucius Nikolai started his job as an Undertaker in 1899 & he is presently over 200 years old.
When I say that this facet of the story leaves the dialogue & character actions feeling disjointed it is because much of what happens relies on a timeline. The spirit of Blanche Caillavet has been waiting for Aunt Hattie for 40 years yet we know she was alive & well in 1938. How long ago did this character die? How long has she been roaming the earth? If the characters who were alive in the past (Blanche & Lucius) are still roaming around now, their dialogue should be altered to create a set distinction between them & the characters who are born in the current Century. Given this book is directly targeting a younger audience, it would be beneficial for the story to include vernacular which saw the characters date themselves, so to speak. For example, the dialogue between Aunt Hattie & Agatha takes on a Southern twang when they are speaking intimately. This is a good way for the reader to understand that Aunt Hattie has lived in the South for a while & is leading Agatha through ‘proper’ Southern talk—even if it’s not necessarily the case, the change in tone adds dimension to the story.
Some reworking in the book will help ease the flow of the story so that Agatha’s character comes across as fully developed. There were often times when I was a bit confused about her behaviour. She is very quick to sacrifice her friends to fulfill her desires—ripping the library book apart without communicating with Leopold, whom she keeps in the dark at all times. A person can be contradictory in their behaviours, inner dialogue & desires, I understand this to be true. However, Agatha reads as very sensitive & introverted & then will do a full 180 & be rude & cruel to other people for no reason at all. Is she meant to come across as confident or threatened by other people? She speaks about how she feels pride in being the ‘bravest’ person in her friend group, totally disregarding the fact that Leopold bends over backward to accompany her everywhere & ensures she gets out of places safe & unharmed.
In this same breath, a bit of editing will sew shut the little holes that popped up along the way of this book. For example:
- Aunt Hattie tells Agatha that her father has the money to buy a new house but we are told that they are very poor.
- We are told that Macbeth sleeps beside Agatha’s bed & then see her tell the reader that his sleeping spot is on the sofa.
- Agatha is shocked that Leopold can see Lucious, assuming he is a ghost, but the man has been sustaining an Undertaker’s role in the town for years on end so everyone would assumedly be able to see him.
- Agatha has a birthday cake with Aunt Hattie at her house on the eve of her 13th birthday but she doesn’t have any celebration at her house with either of her parents. This event is skipped over completely, save for it being mentioned by her teacher.
I can appreciate that it does seem I have many structural critiques for a book whose target audience I am not, however, a good book is, a good book. Everyone deserves the chance to read a story that is well-crafted. The author of this book recognizes that their audience is very smart & willing to go the extra mile to solve a supernatural mystery, entwining history & lore, as evidenced in their writing style & the plot.
Every reader should feel cherished & producing edits to an otherwise enthusiastic read will reinforce the sentiment to those of all ages. When all is said & done I feel confident that this book could be remembered amongst the greats.
Thank you to NetGalley, Crumblebee Books & RJ McDowell for the free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review!