What do you think?
Rate this book
The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy
Unique book about the rise and fall of the famous Habsburg Monarchy
- GenresHistory
482 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1929
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
September 11, 2018
As there are no biographical notes in the edition of The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy that I have, it may be helpful to provide some information on the book and the author. The Dissolution was first published in 1929. Its author, Oscar Jászi, was born near the Hungarian-Romanian border in 1875, and agitated for reform in the Hungarian political process and social issues. He left Hungary in 1919, after the Hungarian revolution, and after a Soviet-influenced regime took over the government. (Information on the author derived from Wikipedia--and there is also a biography of Jászi: A Twentieth-Century Prophet: Oscar Jaszi 1875-1957)
I post this information for the simple reason that I find Jászi's analyses compelling; unfortunately, my understanding of this time period and this part of the world is cursory, and I could have been easily persuaded by arguments contrived by the author which would not hold up to examination by those more familiar with the time and events. Given that the author was intimately involved with the situation he analyzes, both before the fall of the Monarchy and as a member of the post-Habsburg government of Hungary, my concern was, despite the calm and measured approach of the book, that Jászi would not be able to distance himself far enough to escape the inherent bias of his unique position. Rather than foolishly recommending a book with which I have little experience in the subject matter, I thought it would be best to provide what data I could, and other readers could form their own opinion.
The Habsburgs ruled Austria and the Danube Region for four centuries, and Jászi's book is an attempt to answer the question of `whether the Danubian experiment was due to fail because it was...a natural impossibility, or because it was only a consequence of factors depending on will and insight which could have been avoided by a more advanced statesmanship.' In order to answer that question, the book is divided into seven parts, the first of which serves as a sort of introduction and the last as an addendum on the state of civic education in the region and as a summation. But it is the five intervening parts that make up the bulk of the book, and are Jászi's attempt to answer the question he posed at the beginning. 'The Historical Atmosphere', 'The Centripetal Forces', 'The Centrifugal Forces', 'The Dynamics of Centrifugal Forces' and 'The Dangers of Irredenta' outline in exhaustive detail the unique situation of the Habsburg realm: beginning with the history of the Habsburgs, it traces the rise of natural forces both for and against the monarchy, and details the desire of ethnic minorities within the empire to join with those nations outside of Austria and Hungary who shared their language and background.
To Jászi, writing in 1927, the question he posed was not simply an exercise in what might have been; he understood it to be of vital importance: Because the Habsburgs failed to find or employ answers to the most pressing problems affecting their empire, and because many of those same problems affected the region after Versailles, Jászi saw the examination of the problem as an opportunity to formulate practical policies and reforms that could stabilize the newly independent countries. Whether his solutions could have worked at the time or not is, of course, unknowable, but contemporary history of the region tends to bear out the idea that there were still many unresolved issues between the basin's inhabitants.
Irrespective of Jászi's conclusions, the analysis of the region is convincing. It is important, though, to understand that The Dissolution is not popular history, nor even academic, narrative history, but rather political science. Therefore Jászi's focus is on sociological and cultural repercussions of the Monarchy's actions, which then formed popular opinion and often fueled and intense hatred of the Habsburg rule. While I don't believe any one book to be `definitive', I can say that The Dissolution does a better job than anything else I've read to make sense of the antagonistic forces that made up the empire. And, although the book is not about WWI, both the Monarchy and the war are so inextricably linked that many of the same pressures that led to the downfall of the Monarchy were part and parcel of the root causes of the war as it was fought in the Balkans.
As a consequence of the book's aim and of its organization, I found it to be extremely dry and, at times, tiring. While this would normally be a strike against, in this case, I don't believe there was any other effective way to transmit the information that Jászi needed to convey in order to make his analysis complete. The background of the region is not so simply disentangled, and while the raw data does not necessarily make for fascinating reading, it was necessary to go beyond simple explanations for the dissolution of the monarchy. To say that the Habsburg rule was torn apart by nationalistic urges of its citizens is all well and good; but what Jászi is able to accomplish is to give this reader a clear understanding of how these urges came about, what supported them, what options the Monarchy had to counter them, why the Monarchy failed to do so, and to intimate whether anything COULD have been done to change the situation. In the end, it seems to this reader that Jászi's position was that large groups of traditionally disenfranchised people were slowly awakened to nationalistic feeling as a by-product of the Industrial Revolution, and began to agitate for broader recognition. The traditional elites, out of fear of losing their inherited status, recoiled against anything that would disrupt the status quo, and therefore tried to squash this nationalistic feeling. This, of course, was a complete failure, and when the disenfranchised saw that they would find no relief within the Monarchy, they began to edge away. The assassination at Sarajevo became a convenient excuse for these two opposing forces to carry their arguments a step further, and to try to achieve their objectives by force of arms rather than through a political process.
Thinking about Jászi's initial question, I would say that while the author seems to feel that something could have been done to prevent the dissolution, when I look at the same data and add in my own opinion about human nature, I would say there was not anything that would have changed the course of the Monarchy. But no matter what conclusion one might take away from the book, it is the careful analyses of the various issues that make this book a treasure trove for anyone studying this time period and this area of the world. I'm reminded of Theodore Hamerow's Restoration, Revolution, Reaction: Economics and Politics in Germany, 1815-1871, in that the book is immensely detailed, but authoritative on its subject (in this case, the German Revolution of 1848). Like Hammerow's book, The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy is indispensable for students of its subject, and an important component to any library concerned with the Habsburgs and WWI. Highly recommended, with the single caveat that it is very dry reading, and those who are interested, but are used to modern, faster-paced accounts will want to prepare for a methodical, in-depth analysis which took more concentration from this reader than I am used to.
I post this information for the simple reason that I find Jászi's analyses compelling; unfortunately, my understanding of this time period and this part of the world is cursory, and I could have been easily persuaded by arguments contrived by the author which would not hold up to examination by those more familiar with the time and events. Given that the author was intimately involved with the situation he analyzes, both before the fall of the Monarchy and as a member of the post-Habsburg government of Hungary, my concern was, despite the calm and measured approach of the book, that Jászi would not be able to distance himself far enough to escape the inherent bias of his unique position. Rather than foolishly recommending a book with which I have little experience in the subject matter, I thought it would be best to provide what data I could, and other readers could form their own opinion.
The Habsburgs ruled Austria and the Danube Region for four centuries, and Jászi's book is an attempt to answer the question of `whether the Danubian experiment was due to fail because it was...a natural impossibility, or because it was only a consequence of factors depending on will and insight which could have been avoided by a more advanced statesmanship.' In order to answer that question, the book is divided into seven parts, the first of which serves as a sort of introduction and the last as an addendum on the state of civic education in the region and as a summation. But it is the five intervening parts that make up the bulk of the book, and are Jászi's attempt to answer the question he posed at the beginning. 'The Historical Atmosphere', 'The Centripetal Forces', 'The Centrifugal Forces', 'The Dynamics of Centrifugal Forces' and 'The Dangers of Irredenta' outline in exhaustive detail the unique situation of the Habsburg realm: beginning with the history of the Habsburgs, it traces the rise of natural forces both for and against the monarchy, and details the desire of ethnic minorities within the empire to join with those nations outside of Austria and Hungary who shared their language and background.
To Jászi, writing in 1927, the question he posed was not simply an exercise in what might have been; he understood it to be of vital importance: Because the Habsburgs failed to find or employ answers to the most pressing problems affecting their empire, and because many of those same problems affected the region after Versailles, Jászi saw the examination of the problem as an opportunity to formulate practical policies and reforms that could stabilize the newly independent countries. Whether his solutions could have worked at the time or not is, of course, unknowable, but contemporary history of the region tends to bear out the idea that there were still many unresolved issues between the basin's inhabitants.
Irrespective of Jászi's conclusions, the analysis of the region is convincing. It is important, though, to understand that The Dissolution is not popular history, nor even academic, narrative history, but rather political science. Therefore Jászi's focus is on sociological and cultural repercussions of the Monarchy's actions, which then formed popular opinion and often fueled and intense hatred of the Habsburg rule. While I don't believe any one book to be `definitive', I can say that The Dissolution does a better job than anything else I've read to make sense of the antagonistic forces that made up the empire. And, although the book is not about WWI, both the Monarchy and the war are so inextricably linked that many of the same pressures that led to the downfall of the Monarchy were part and parcel of the root causes of the war as it was fought in the Balkans.
As a consequence of the book's aim and of its organization, I found it to be extremely dry and, at times, tiring. While this would normally be a strike against, in this case, I don't believe there was any other effective way to transmit the information that Jászi needed to convey in order to make his analysis complete. The background of the region is not so simply disentangled, and while the raw data does not necessarily make for fascinating reading, it was necessary to go beyond simple explanations for the dissolution of the monarchy. To say that the Habsburg rule was torn apart by nationalistic urges of its citizens is all well and good; but what Jászi is able to accomplish is to give this reader a clear understanding of how these urges came about, what supported them, what options the Monarchy had to counter them, why the Monarchy failed to do so, and to intimate whether anything COULD have been done to change the situation. In the end, it seems to this reader that Jászi's position was that large groups of traditionally disenfranchised people were slowly awakened to nationalistic feeling as a by-product of the Industrial Revolution, and began to agitate for broader recognition. The traditional elites, out of fear of losing their inherited status, recoiled against anything that would disrupt the status quo, and therefore tried to squash this nationalistic feeling. This, of course, was a complete failure, and when the disenfranchised saw that they would find no relief within the Monarchy, they began to edge away. The assassination at Sarajevo became a convenient excuse for these two opposing forces to carry their arguments a step further, and to try to achieve their objectives by force of arms rather than through a political process.
Thinking about Jászi's initial question, I would say that while the author seems to feel that something could have been done to prevent the dissolution, when I look at the same data and add in my own opinion about human nature, I would say there was not anything that would have changed the course of the Monarchy. But no matter what conclusion one might take away from the book, it is the careful analyses of the various issues that make this book a treasure trove for anyone studying this time period and this area of the world. I'm reminded of Theodore Hamerow's Restoration, Revolution, Reaction: Economics and Politics in Germany, 1815-1871, in that the book is immensely detailed, but authoritative on its subject (in this case, the German Revolution of 1848). Like Hammerow's book, The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy is indispensable for students of its subject, and an important component to any library concerned with the Habsburgs and WWI. Highly recommended, with the single caveat that it is very dry reading, and those who are interested, but are used to modern, faster-paced accounts will want to prepare for a methodical, in-depth analysis which took more concentration from this reader than I am used to.
March 27, 2022
If any one of you my friends want to build a nation then civic education is the number one highly recommend X
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews