Jump to ratings and reviews

Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and Class in the Campaign against Woman Suffrage

When Tennessee became the thirty-sixth and final state needed to ratify the Nineteenth Amendment in August 1920, giving women the right to vote, one group of women expressed bitter disappointment and vowed to fight against “this feminist disease.” Why this fierce and extended opposition? In Splintered Sisterhood , Susan Marshall argues that the women of the antisuffrage movement mobilized not as threatened homemakers but as influential political strategists.
    Drawing on surviving records of major antisuffrage organizations, Marshall makes clear that antisuffrage women organized to protect gendered class interests. She shows that many of the most vocal antisuffragists were wealthy, educated women who exercised considerable political influence through their personal ties to men in politics as well as by their own positions as leaders of social service committees. Under the guise of defending an ideal of “true womanhood,” these powerful women sought to keep the vote from lower-class women, fearing it would result in an increase in the “ignorant vote” and in their own displacement from positions of influence. This book reveals the increasingly militant style of antisuffrage protest as the conflict over female voting rights escalated. Splintered Sisterhood adds a missing piece to the history of women’s rights activism in the United States and illuminates current issues of antifeminism.

320 pages, Paperback

First published July 15, 1997

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Susan E. Marshall

4 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (28%)
4 stars
8 (57%)
3 stars
1 (7%)
2 stars
1 (7%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Sarah .
272 reviews11 followers
March 6, 2020
Heavily focused on Massachusetts women and organizations, but provides clear arguments for and against suffrage while recognizing the paradox of public anti suffrage advocacy against involvement in the public sphere.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review