Desire, its essence and its effect, informs Apology for Want. With precise language and evocative metaphor, Mary Jo Bang convinces us of our "always ravenous hunger." Employing penetrating images, she explicates the consequences of our dogged wanting. We cannot extricate ourselves from this cycle of desire and regret, nor should we choose to, as Bang reminds us in "Cafe Edgar," the powerful final poem in this collection.
Mary Jo Bang is an American poet. In her most recent collection, The Bride of E, she uses a distinctive mix of humor, directness, and indirection, to sound the deepest sort of anguish: the existential condition. Bang fashions her examination of the lived life into an abecedarius—the title of the first poem, "ABC Plus E: Cosmic Aloneness Is the Bride of Existence," posits the collection's central problem, and a symposium of figures from every register of our culture (from Plato to Pee-wee Herman, Mickey Mouse to Sartre) is assembled to help confront it.
Bang is the author of five previous books of poetry: Apology for Want, Louise in Love, The Downstream Extremity of the Isle of Swans, The Eye Like a Strange Balloon and Elegy, which won the 2007 National Book Critics Circle Award in Poetry and was named a 2008 New York Times Notable Book. She’s been the recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship and a Hodder Fellowship from Princeton University. She has an M.F.A. from Columbia University, an M.A. and B.A. in Sociology from Northwestern University, and a B.A. in Photography from the Polytechnic of Central London. From 1995-2005 she was the poetry co-editor at Boston Review. She lives in St. Louis, Missouri, where she is a Professor of English and teaches in the Creative Writing Program at Washington University.
Mary Jo Bang is a known poet for quite sometime already, and it is only in 2016 that I have learned about her. Apology For Want had a melancholic tone to it, something you could not simply miss, but also it had assertiveness . It was a perfect mixture of push and pull, of gentleness and aggressiveness, of longing and wanting. It was something that you would go back to over and over, for each poem takes on a different meaning every time you encounter them. Here is a favorite poem from this collection:
Autopsy
How bare the soul – unmasked, deveined, picked clean. How smooth the flesh in death. Someone has arrived to wash the dust away. Mulberry stains. Indelible marks in hidden places. Look at you. No longer resisting, unfolding with ease; revealing scars from wounds that were slow to heal. The body remembers. You never won but dearly battled. The sky here is streaked with tile. The scientific community and the mildly curious have all come to watch. You bloom in this forest of white.
Reading this book, I’m reminded that Mary Jo Bang was a photographer before publishing this book. It’s something in my Bang readings that I wish I would have realized earlier. Because it speaks most directly to this speaker I’m always hearing in her work. The arch observer, the knows-better-than-you-but-you-probably-don’t-appreciate-it companion who’s taken the opportunity of the poem to explain that to you. I wrote about this some when I was companioning Bang’s speaker in the “The Harbor” to Jennifer S. Cheng’s essay “A Catalog of Falling.” I’ve long been enamored with this speaker. And appreciated how sharply she contrasts her perspective from anyone else in the room. Poet knows best might be one way to think of it.
I would argue the speaker in Apology for Want is like a version of Elizabeth Bishop preparing the way for Mary Jo Bang’s Louise, who appears in her second book, Louise in Love. To stretch my analogies so they fit with one another, imagine this speaker styled like Elizabeth Bishop, whose knowing observations shed light on some domestic subjects, some medical subjects (especially the body in its biological existence), and this “Elizabeth Bishop”-ish speaker has taken her gift for observation and framing to photograph some especially resonant scenes. This, for me, is the poetry of Mary Jo Bang's first book. Poems like “If Wishes Were Horses” or “Metaphor as Symptom of Reason’s Despair” offer what feels like a gilded frame to the Louise that will soon be arriving in her next book.
I remember the first time I’d heard her read from it, when she was emphasizing the the letter sounds that were being closely echoed. And I remember finding it curious that this would be what was emphasized for the poems. Because I still don’t hear those letter sounds when I’m reading the poems to myself. Yes, in “Twilight Amnesia,” there are letter pairings carved like inlaid ivory into a wooden box. But those pairings have a specific purpose, speaking to the poet’s relationship with her stepson. The majority of the book reads as a speaker removed from whatever immediate circumstance prompted the poem, providing sufficient space for her to carefully articulate what she sees happening. Perhaps what she sees carefully tracks with the actual scene. Comments she would pass to the actual people the poet imagines speaking to. Where the poems are like velvet rhetorical cudgels.
It’s not yet, however, the poetic speaker who’s deeply invested in affect and giving the reader that knowing look in her eye. A poetic speaker I find dominating Bang’s work since.
This book is my sweetest corner of the world. I crawl back into it every time that I am lost.
When I first read this book, I was in college studying economics. Poetry was the perfect pallet cleanser back then. Now, as a working adult, I find myself drawn to prose and plot. However, Apology for Want still rang true. It's an escape that leads you right back to yourself.
No other reading experience makes me feel so centered in my body. Apology for Want is almost entirely about the human sensory experience and where that butts heads with yearning and existentialism. It spoke perfectly to a 19-year-old who was constantly being pulled out of her body and into a world designed to mock, yet prod, desire. It also spoke perfectly to a tired 25-year-old who needed a reminder of self. I have a feeling it will continue to speak perfectly to me at many intervals in the future.
My favorite thing about this collection is the lost sense of modernity. You can't pin down the time frame of these poems. Cars, surgeries, and prairie houses all illude to a post-war America; but it's vague. I was shocked, but somehow comforted, when I learned Apology for Want was published in 1997. It adds a certain knowing, or maybe a newness, to these words. It's a modern work that rejects the cliches, the dead give-aways and becomes quintessentially timeless.
A wonderful book of poetry. Certainly not everyone's cup of tea, but beautiful throughout. Existential, nihilistic, lyrical, and then, a surprise…love.