I forget exactly when and how I first discovered Luke O'Neil's work but it was somewhere around the beginning of the pandemic and probably via some combination or overlap of left Twitter, Defector, and various Substack newsletters. Wait now I remember - it was his "The Last Normal Day" series that one or another of the writers I follow on Twitter or elsewhere must have been featured on. From there I explored more of O'Neil's work and it kept popping up throughout the year and sure enough eventually I went "yeah this guy deserves my money in the form of a book purchase" and that is how I end up reading like eighty percent of the nonfiction I read these days. At any rate, Lockdown in Hell World is a spin-off of sorts, a COVID-19 pandemic addendum of sorts to the previous and twice-as-long Welcome to Hell World, which is presumably a mixed bag of essays and interviews just like this thing was, but which I have not yet read. I've enjoyed O'Neil's style and passion previous to diving in here - mad as hell, stream of consciousness flow, always handy with a deeply cutting line or observation - but I've got two main gripes with the book I just read. One is that it felt rushed, by which I mean it was both a teeny bit sloppy (underlined words in a paperback betraying their history as hyperlinks) and very premature. Which isn't to say that this is Andrew Cuomo releasing "How I beat COVID-19 in New York" in the summer of 2020 or anything, but rather that there's an awful lot of March-through-August of 2020 here and that the book already feels quaint and dated even though it shouldn't, as a collection of thoughts and fears and worries recorded and written at the front end of "this whole thing" if you will. Like I think he finished writing this at some point in November and, man, it was all just about to get both so much worse (spikes!) and so much better (vaccines!) and because of that - and maybe this is hindsight being 20/20 or whatever - this almost feels like it only covers the first of three "acts" if you will. And yes maybe I'm a goddamn fool for insinuating that we have reached the final act here in April 2021, even if only here in America, but yeah there's just this entire chunk of the pandemic "story" that feels like it's missing. In fairness this is maybe only supposed to cover the "lockdown" portion of the whole thing, which we were pretty collectively done with by June or whatever, but then if that's the case why does this overextend itself into police brutality protests and the beginning of the general election season? I digress. My other gripe is that 250 straight pages of doom and gloom is just an awful lot to swallow. A pessimistic essay can be a beautiful read; thirty straight can be a bit much! Especially when at least some of the pessimism and doom and gloom and fear feel unfounded just a few months later. Like all these interviews with people losing their minds about "pandemic deniers" congregating en masse at beaches, or restaurant workers worried that they'll catch covid from people drinking on outdoor patios. That said I know the point of something such as this isn't so much depicting accurate risk assessments as much as capturing the mindsets of the people who had to live through all this uncertainty, so maybe you can crumple up this whole gripe and whip it into the next waste bin you see.