Timewise is a semi-biographical book about Ron Larson, following his life while the plot serves as more of a backdrop. It’s difficult to put my finger on this book, since the story is constantly developing in new ways and it seems to focus on introducing new perspectives more than anything else. It does this through showing Ron Larson these different perspectives, whether it’s a new hobby like poker or botany early in the book, or alternative views of physics that are sprinkled in throughout. In this way, Ron is a great character for this story, since he accepts whatever new ideas are presented to him without much resistance, however these new ideas aren’t all incorporated into the story in the best way to make them feel worthwhile. The aforementioned poker and botany really aren’t mentioned later in the novel beyond minor scenes that don’t play as large a role in the story as I think was intended. Ultimately, these different avenues of the plot don’t feel relevant, making those subplots and chapters about Ron learning these things seem pointless. I can see places where all of these plotlines were intended to affect Ron in some serious ways, but I don’t think it was successful in weaving the elements into his personality. In some ways, he finishes the book feeling as much of a blank slate as he started the book, at least to me.
My biggest issue with this book came from this biographical tracking of Ron’s life. I was intrigued by the blurb for this book, and was disappointed to find that the plot described therein only really came into play about halfway through the book. Instead, there are stretches that are chapters long where Ron spends away from the city where the plot is occurring, which is cancerous for the enjoyment of someone who picked the book up for the plot. In fact, when he returns, we’re given some quick exposition about what happened in the plot while he was gone. I would’ve much preferred a stretch of chapters with Regina as the POV character, because the story that we were told happened with her was far more interesting than what happened with Ron.
This novel thrives on novelty. The strongest stretch of this book, for me, was the earliest parts, with new ideas being introduced, and interesting perspectives being portrayed. The problem is, that not enough developments were presented in the existing plot, and so these constant subplots just feel like distractions from the rather stagnant main plot. When someone like Louise, or Sheila is introduced, it’s a new perspective, a new avenue for Robert Leet to form Ron’s worldview, and so it feels fun and exciting, but then it ultimately either drags on with no new developments until it’s uninteresting, or is cut short before it has a chance to grow dull. Leet shows an astute ability to add developments like these, and I wish he focused that talent of his on developing the existing plots instead of adding new ones. It was fun at first, but I ultimately grew tired of feeling like my attention was constantly being misdirected.
And like I said, the plot doesn’t occur until the halfway point of the book, and the inciting incident and climax are separated by roughly four or five chapters. It feels like Leet had a different story he wanted to tell, and so delayed the main plot for most of the book, and then rushed it when it arrived. Coupling this with the exposition used in setting up the main plot, I was very unimpressed. I mean, there are so many scenes where Regina just sits Ron down and tells him about physics, which is really just Robert Leet telling us about physics. Complete with diagrams and all, these scenes were always eye-rolling, and never well-integrated into the plot. The scenes would often even start with Regina saying, "Remember what we talked about last time? This time I'll tell you this other thing!" And then it goes on and on for pages, stopping only to explain to us the type of coffee Ron got during the meeting. The worst part about this exposition is that we spend chapter after chapter hearing Regina explain how theoretically this time machine could work, but we never get an explanation on how they actually created it. Like, there’s no deep dive on the gears and wires, or any of the components to this thing, so I know how it works theoretically but not at all practically. So I’m unimpressed with this accomplishment of theirs without knowledge of how it works, and I didn’t feel like I was ever convinced why they should have it. There are entire conversations dedicated to the fact that this machine could be dangerous in other people’s hands, but I was never convinced why it wasn’t dangerous in Regina and Ron’s hands. So, I didn’t understand the machine from a practical standpoint, and I didn’t get how they deserved the power when others didn’t. It would be one thing if the author acknowledged that they were being hypocritical, but he never does, despite the fact that the only thing they ever use this machine for is to predict the stock market. That’s a very greedy use of this machine, yet they’re terrified others might use it for selfish or greedy reasons. So, the main prompt of this story wasn’t very compelling in my opinion.
I will say that I found many of the character resolutions to be satisfying. I have to give the ending some credit, because it went in some interesting and unpredictable directions. That being said, the unpredictability also leads to a feeling of being not set up. While the latter third of this book is a rumination on the fallout of the conflict with DeVries, I at first feared it might be boring, but it truly wasn’t. I enjoyed this slower resolution. It felt like a good exploration of some realistic repercussions, but some of the repercussions felt like they weren’t set up beforehand. Still, the twists were interesting and I thought they worked from a character perspective, and I honestly think the last two chapters are two of the best in the book.
There are a lot of strengths to this. Leet really could polish his craft into something special. I truly think so. The way that new perspectives and ideas are communicated could be adjusted to be better woven into the narrative, and it would highlight his strength in making the reader think in different ways. His development of characters could be adjusted to show off a similar idea, and if he could incorporate new elements into the main plot in the way that he does with the side plots, he could excel at maintaining the reader’s interest throughout. Though this review has been fairly negative, I think there’s the makings of a good story hidden in this book, and if Leet could learn from his missteps, he could make some incredible books. I’ll definitely be checking out some of his later works, since I’m sure he can improve.