A more accurate title might be The toxicity of common plants... , because the thoroughness of the coverage gives the impression that every yard, house, garden, and forest plant has some part that is known or suspected to be at least mildly toxic. A guide for parents, outdoorspeople, and healthcare workers to protecting young children. Includes beautiful color photographs and guides for quick identification of the plant or mushroom, a summary of its toxicity, suggestions for treatment, and additional notes. Annotation copyright Book News, Inc. Portland, Or.
Nancy Jean Turner, CM OBC FRSC FLS, is an ethnobotanist whose research integrates the fields of botany and ecology with anthropology, geography and linguistics, among others. She is interested in the traditional knowledge systems and traditional land and resource management systems of Indigenous Peoples, particularly in western Canada.
Love this book! I don’t have any extended experience with plants and vegetables beside breathing the precious oxygen that they produce so this book is perfect. I recognized some of the plants in there, some I have no idea is poisonous. Such a great educational book.
I found some info a bit outdated. Seems like they tried to make the book longer and included plants that are not really a concern for poisonings. For example the book talks about certain trees and bushes having toxic bark or stems if eaten in large amounts..... which no one would do
"This is a toxic alkaloid. And so is this. And so is this." Super fascinating subject, but there has to be some kind of better way of talking about poisonous plants than just listing all of them in alphabetic order. I would have enjoyed more general discussion about the evolutionary role of toxins and the phylogenetic relationships between different poisonous species (it was touched on somewhat, and those parts I liked the best -- I just wish there had been more of them). The mushroom section was good because of the way the amanitas were covered, and their relationships between species discussed to give us a broader vision of the mushroom world. But after the first third of the book, it sort of just devolved into a list of species with increasingly similar traits, with increasingly less discussion. What about the relationship between potatoes and nightshade? Why solanine? What are cyanogenic glycosides doing in almost every kind of fruit pit? I think perhaps any problems I have with this book are problems that I have with most science books that aren't really intended for scientists: a lot of information is held back because it's seen as "too technical" for a layperson to be interested in... But I think it's all about how you frame the information, and general audiences should be given more credit (especially if they're already picking up a science book). This might be a good resource for people writing novels, or for DMs working alchemy into their RPGs, and perhaps a jumping point for people more interested in the science to look for other more specific books.
Actually it was pretty interesting though not one for a full read through unless you're fascinated by plants. Something to take with you if the apocalypse hits and you need to try and find edible plants because there seem to be few of them/how are we not all dead.