I initially rated Hunting the Silence at 4 stars, but the more I thought about it, the more much of it seemed contrived or did not make sense. If you intend to read the book and don't want spoillers, then do not continue.
****Spoilers****
The book starts with a continuation of a story from the previous novel - then drops it like a bad habit, and there is no mention of it for the remainder of the book - weird! Then when a young boy is talked into sleeping in a dark forest and accidently finds an old skeleton while breaking his arm, he is so unaffected by it that he decides barely a week later to traipse through the very same dark forest by himself! This would literally never happen for two main reasons. First, he would have been severely traumitized and would surely never go near that forst again until he was an adult - perhaps not even then! Secondly, his overprotective mother would have insisted he never go near that forset again - especially by himself!
When a story needs to be based on a contrived occurrence it is an example of an author's inability to produce a more believable story line. This is not to say the book was not engaging, which it was for the most part. Unfortunately, this contrived story line and the reason the killer choose who she did was disturbing and confusing, as her choices were children who never did anything to her.
The fact that the overall rating for this book is 4.5 stars indicates the lack of discernment and sophistication of today's readers - unfortunate and concerning!