In part 1, Scott McKnight unpacks what abuse looks like in the church as he mainly focuses on the examples of abuse by James MacDonald at Harvest Bible Chapel and Bill Hybels at Willow Creek Community Church. In part 2, he unpacks how to create a culture of "tov" in your church. When it comes to accomplishing his thesis, I think the book is solid.
My pushback to this book is what I think is Scott's lack of wisdom and understanding of the audience he is writing to. Scott is clearly joining the crowd/movement that is rising up against abuse in the church. And for good reason! James MacDonald, Bill Hybels, Ravi Zacharias, etc., were sick men. There are surely countless more out there. Scott's book is a good resource that exposes what these cultures of abuse look like.
The lack of wisdom, though, is the lack to understand the weaknesses in this movement. The audience that Scott is writing to is prone to make mistakes such as seeing abuse where there actually is not any. They can err in labeling non-abusive mistakes as "traumatic" or "abusive" or "manipulative" or "toxic" to the extreme that at any point someone is offended, they can pull these cards. There can be little room for any sort of mistakes, or any sort of honest evaluation of the allegations. Scott stirs this negative aspect by adopting these terms and using them loosely. He also stirs by providing absolutely no nuance, a point which is heroic in the movement. This to me is a weak and unwise point of contextualization.
The book lacks the awareness and wisdom that though it is helpful and needed to expose abuse, this emphasis can lead to significant issues without nuance. For example, imagine an abuser that isn't an elder. He can exercise the same abuse on the flip side by falsely calling his leaders abusive, tearing down the church, and gaining a big following himself. Abuse takes many forms, and elders are not the only ones prone to it. Scott would do well to add a chapter exposing things like:
- what false accusations might look like
- the danger seeing abuse everywhere
- the danger of drawing conclusions without seeking evidence (Especially if your evaluating someone else's church!)
But of course, to do so would be to enable abusers.
A final note: If you follow Scott closely in his writing and social media, you would know that the reason Scott does not provide his readers with this insight is because Scott himself lacks it, or will not be as praised if he included it.