"Long May His Story Be Told" - Let's hope not. The Anthology is riddled with poorly written essays and articles to the detriment of the reader. Dry, verbose, using the vernacular of the Earp's period - to the point I began to think plagiarism, and unoriginal. Filled with quotes, citations (expected) and references of little consequence (do I really need to know about xxxx who is mentioned only once without any idea why except that he was there?) It would be much improved to simply provide the referenced material in whole and let the reader decide who Wyatt Earp was. There are a few works which use modern language and citation standards, making them more interesting reading.
I'm familiar with anthological work and didn't expect any firework, embellished drama; but, this is so badly done by authors trying to mimic their writing style of the period they are writing about that the message is almost lost in the words. Thankfully I've read other books about Earp that do a better job. Honestly he doesn't deserve all this obsessive, minute detailed attention.
I'm not sure I would call this a "balanced" effort only an effort to find the biographical "truth" of Wyatt Earp's life, which became emblematic of his period. The excessive attention to what is "true" or not seems to become less important when put back into context of his time.
If the reader is interested in an unvarnished, and I do mean "rough", focus of Earp and wants to have only one book of reference, this is it. However, there are better written books that will give the reader much the same information.