The Lord of the Rings: The Films, The Books, The Radio Series

by Jim Smith, J. Clive Matthews

A detailed look at the recent trilogy, it's various predecessors, both failed and successful - animated film, radio plays, parodies and imitations - and the multimillion dollar industry that has sprung up around the books in the wake of the massive critical and commercial success of Peter Jackson's trilogy. An essential reference for all fans of The Lord of the Rings in all its permutations.

Genres: Nonfiction, Reference

234 pages, Paperback

First published September 1, 2004

About the author

Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name.

Jim Smith, the laziest (yet still professional) teacher in town, is a head of school, education consultant, Independent Thinking Associate, speaker and bestselling author.

Reviews

[Geoffery Crescent · Rating 4 out of 5]

Apart from a few spelling errors and mistakes concerning the Jackson trilogy, this book was well-researched, well written and an enjoyable read. Although I disagreed with some of the statements the two authors made regarding the adaptations (neither thought Aragorn's 'death and rebirth sequence in the Two Towers unnecessary for example, but added to his Christ-like overtones) and is now a little dated, the Hobbit hand't even been greenlit when this book was published. For any fan of Tolien however, this is a valuable read.

[Chris · Rating 4 out of 5]

In the words of the authors, this study is "an attempt to examine the process(es) whereby Tolkien's books have been adapted into performed drama". By Tolkien's books they mean principally The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit; by performed drama they mean films and radio plays, though passing reference is given to Donald Swann's song cycle The Road Goes Ever On, Leonard Nimoy's curiosity The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins and other more or less ephemeral items selected by the authors, even if such a selection can never be comprehensive. All discussion centres on those adaptations rather than on a critique of Tolkien's writing, though of course comparisons are made between the original text and subsequent interpretations.

The larger part of Smith and Matthews' study is naturally taken up with Jackson's impressive first trilogy of films (though it predates Jackson's The Hobbit trilogy it does briefly anticipate his involvement in the later project). However, the authors draw attention to lesser known but preceding performances of both books: the reportedly calamitous 1956 BBC twelve-part radio series of The Lord of the Rings, the more successful BBC radio adaptation in 1966 of The Hobbit in eight episodes (still available on CD, and featuring early music instruments) and the TV animation of The Hobbit broadcast on NBC in 1977. These were followed by in close succession by another animation, Bakshi's JRR Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings released in cinemas in 1978, the TV animation JRR Tolkien's The Return of the King: a Tale of Hobbits broadcast on NBC in 1980, and the thirteen-episode BBC radio serial first aired in 1981.

The authors reserve their admiration for the Jackson films, which they argue has more artistic integrity than any the other films while largely remaining faithful to the spirit of the original text. The compromises and creative decisions made in the films they maintain (and I agree) respects Tolkien's imaginative creation while making those justifiable changes that either accompany any transference from page to screen or seek to make consistent what Tolkien's rambling epic fails to do, despite the author's later revisions.

This was an enjoyable read, not just for the discussion of the Jackson films but also for the previous Tolkien outings that I've either seen or heard or been vaguely aware of. There are plenty of asides (such as details of various actors involved in the productions), trenchant criticisms (particularly of aspects of the animated films) and a sterling defence of the approach New Line took in re-focusing character motivation and manipulating plotlines. For a study of this length (a little over 200 pages of discussion) the authors cover a huge subject in as comprehensive a way as space allows. My only real criticisms concern the occasion typo, in particular the confusion evident when one of the authors writes 'principle' (a truth or belief) when what he means is 'principal' (main or primary); other than that, this is a fine analysis of the right and wrong ways to go about adapting well-loved texts for another medium.