I read this as a challenge to myself—to deeply engage with an ideology that I vehemently disagree with.
This book lays out the Christian nationalist belief system. And when Robertson says “the soul of America” he means that literally— as if America is a person who is lost and sinful. Definitely not the same meaning of “soul” that was seen as threatened by Trump’s lies & incitement. This other definition of soul represents the values of our country— its openness, opportunity, inclusiveness, equality & compassion. Which all sound like Christian values, right? But they’re not what Robertson goes on about.
I think this is the key point and we haven’t even opened the book yet— Robertson isn’t espousing American values, but rather a subset that seeks to divide the country into “real”—white, rural, Christian, “simple”— Americans and the rest who, by this definition, are delusional sinners who are a threat to the country. We’re not even talking about the same America, or the same values, though the words used are the same. It’s code, a shadow language saying the opposite. This alternate reality embraces by Christian nationalists like Robertson is what terrifies & enrages me as a practicing Christian. Self-righteousness is a sin, too— Pharisees.
In the same way that most of this ideology (wearing the duck-hunting camo of Christian righteousness) is Old Testament in tone, it’s view of America is also a fundamentalist & literalist one. This ideology which Robertson spends an entire book rationalizing comes after squinting at the Bible and looking at America through the wrong end of a telescope.
My frustration is that I believe Robertson to be a genuinely Christian man. He mentions the virtue of helping out struggling neighbors, and engaging with troubled souls. But this isn’t a Christian book at heart, it’s a political one. Those genuine examples of lived discipleship are rare & only early in the book. They don’t come up again after diving into the ideology of Christian nationalism and that is exactly my point. They don’t because they have nothing in common with it. This is a man trying to shoehorn his religion into his politics. And it can’t work.
Christian nationalist ideology—prevalent among evangelicals but also found in any conservative Christian strain, including the Catholicism I profess—declares America was founded on Christian principles (implicitly white European) & must be restored to a biblical-based government. It denies pluralism, self-determination, diversity & freedom to any non-Christians. And most offensively to me, it attempts to do so with a contorted & selective interpretation of the message of love & mercy preached by Jesus.
And perhaps even worse, I don’t think Robertson actually likes Trump. He rarely mentions Trump by name. In the cult of personality Republicans have created around Trump, support of the ideology is identical to support of the man. But not for Robertson. He doesn’t laud Trump for his godliness & goodness in the grotesque way that many other evangelicals have/do. However, Robertson declares himself a Republican & spends the book justifying the Trumpist agenda. This dissonance just points out the contortions Robertson has to put himself through to land where does. To be for Trump’s flagrantly cruel & selfish principles but against the man himself? It’s like saying you love the Bible, but don’t believe in God.
Robertson approaches the glaring contradiction only twice. Trump wasn’t calling the tiki-torch-carrying racists in Charlottesville “fine people,” in Robertson’s opinion. Apparently he just meant the other racists there— the ones without the torches. He recognizes parenthetically— as he blasts liberals for their “hate & vitriol,” that Trump spews it regularly on Twitter and then ... nothing. The whole question goes begging here, in a faux-honest, half-assed nod to reality. The book is all the more pathetic for breaking its narrow focus on its chosen alternate reality in these cynical attempts to appear objective.
So the book ends up as a heap of self-righteous & dishonest bullshit. A rationalization giving Christians permission to be anti-gay, anti-intellectual, anti-democratic, anti-govt, bigoted, climate change deniers. The very worst of Christian nationalist intentions. Wrapped up in the golly-gee, river rat, down-home veneer that appears to confer unassailable moral authority. Use small words & zero-sum simplifications and it must be true.
Robertson, with a veneer of folksy down-home wisdom and the repeated lame proclamation that he “has done the research,” fails completely to justify contemporary right-wing intolerance and ignorance through the idea of the “kingdom” of God on earth. Jesus politics, rather than those of Man. I give his effort one star for the clarity he provides on how to implement the Christian fundamentalist equivalent of sharia law in America. Because he says openly, this vision is not about democracy—it is about everyone being made to live under the edicts of his belief system alone.
He writes a chapter defending gun rights by saying explicitly that guns don’t kill people, hate does. There’s nothing in the Bible defending the right to bear arms so he refers instead to the 2nd Commandment, er, Amendment as the sacred source. Through God’s grace alone, he does not take at a stab at defending the xenophobic anti-immigrant rhetoric of his party of choice. He just ignores it instead. Of course. Having to confront how that explicitly contradicts his Jesus’s teachings would dilute the righteous certainty & performative moral clarity he wears like a camo ball cap.
So he’s not defending Trump, you see, just everything he cynically represents to the gullible masses. So it’s ok then? Buff out the cruelty, the vulgarity, and the sociopathic ticks and polish it up with Jesus wax—there we go. Ready to cruise down Main Street America on a Friday night, with our God Guns & Trump bumper sticker and wearing our dress waders. As American, and Christian, as apple pie wrapped in the Stars & Stripes.
Lord forgive them for they know not what they are doing.