I think, in many cases, what people say and do are often received in isolation from a wider context. Talking past one another while feeling justifiably unheard seems to be a remarkably common phenomenon. Frazier wrote largely in the early 20th century, and Lincoln in the late 20th. They both were engaging a history prior to their own, and they did so with a mixture of scholarship and readability that’s very difficult to carry out. In sum, Frazier and Lincoln offer a crucial context for events and conversations that are happening right now, specifically along the lines of racism, social justice, ethnocentrism, nationalism, and more. There’s primary source material here, too, which serves as a stark notice that these conversations are far from new, and that makes these pages somewhat haunting for me. Haunting because there are real problems that need to be addressed - there’s a legitimate history that’s been long buried and blatantly ignored, and it needs to be brought to light. Who is sufficient for these things? To do so requires great humility, piercing insight, and a kind of love that’s far from common. It’s easy to paint the picture of a world where there are only villains and victims, with no shades of grey between the two. (That’s arguably the way in which racist-histories are written!) Much harder is the messy, difficult work of telling the truth from a variety of perspectives, all for the sake of flourishing. This was not the job of Frazier of Lincoln, but their short account here is a needed piece for any who want to better understand, and hopefully engage, the troubles of our times. May the Lord have mercy and help us do so.