Jump to ratings and reviews

The Asian World, 600-1500

Includes bibliographical references and index.

173 pages, Hardcover

First published September 22, 2005

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (11%)
4 stars
5 (55%)
3 stars
2 (22%)
2 stars
1 (11%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
432 reviews
June 21, 2017
I liked the amount of easily digested material, the reference list, and the fact that there was an index.

I was less fond of how the book was structured in terms of time frames. There was a lot of jumping back and forth in time, and it could have been clearer.

Definitely good for middle grades, and for others searching for an overview.
559 reviews
September 9, 2025
Cogent, quick, high-level overview of various regions of the Asian continent, with a strong focus on China, followed by India, Korea, Japan, and Central Asia. It includes excerpts from primary texts, plenty of pictures, and the prose is legible for the vast majority of reading levels. Necessarily, this means a lot of detail and nuance can't be included, but what is here is factual & useful.
Profile Image for Jenevieve.
937 reviews13 followers
June 26, 2011
Review first written on My Blog in May 2011 during my first reading of the book. Check out all my reviews there!

Middle School History covering China, Korea, India, and Japan from 600AD-1500AD. I really enjoyed the presentation and learning more about this period of time in Asia. Interesting to see how religion spread through the different areas and how it would change in accordance to the needs of the people of that region. I found it fascinating to learn that the Korea had a movable metal-type printing machine 50yrs before Gutenberg made his movable type press. There were lots of little tidbits like that which makes the history much more fun and accessible to the middle schooler and even to those adults (like me) who tend to find history dry and boring.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews