Ruth Elizabeth Borson, who writes under the name Roo Borson (born 20 January 1952 in Berkeley, California) is a Canadian poet who lives in Toronto. She is a graduate of the University of British Columbia.
She has received many awards for her work, including the Governor General's Literary Award, 2004, and the Griffin Poetry Prize, 2005 for Short Journey Upriver Toward Oishida. She lives in Toronto with poet Kim Maltman, and with Maltman and Andy Patton is a member of the collaborative performance poetry ensemble Pain Not Bread.
Footsteps, snow against the window, The dog twitches in its sleep. A sound half snarl, half whimper. You touch its neck. A thousand centuries and still one simple gesture is too huge to gather in one pair of arms. You turn your head and the shadows turn with it, filling with hollows. Now the dogs ouside sound far off, crazy, barking at the snow. They lunge at drifts and come up shaking nothing, muzzles white with snow, as if that were enough. And maybe it is, maybe it is. In the morning we will go out where the children have been making angels in the snow and see they have no heads, no faith, no need of reason.
The last part, "Snow" was a bit uneven for me. But the beginning was really beautiful, impressionistic, and Borson slips into very evocative ways of thinking...I'm thinking of the poem of the sun as a sparrow, the poem about the owl, and others. It falls a bit flat for me when it becomes didactic or the message is too sentimental (wild horses) or self-evident, like there is a flatness to the underlying spiritual conceits, everything is reduced to earth, but not in the way Flaubert talked about with the men between Marcus Aurelius and Cicero. But the first sections were really stunning to me and actually I could see so clearly the "student of Gluck"
The last part, "Snow" was a bit uneven for me. But the beginning was really beautiful, impressionistic, and Borson slips into very evocative ways of thinking...I'm thinking of the poem of the sun as a sparrow, the poem about the owl, and others. It falls a bit flat for me when it becomes didactic or the message is too sentimental (wild horses) or self-evident, like there is a flatness to the underlying spiritual conceits, everything is reduced to earth, but not in the way Flaubert talked about with the men between Marcus Aurelius and Cicero. But the first sections were really stunning to me and actually I could see so clearly the "student of Gluck"