Although I have previously lamented my tendency to treat Church History as ancillary to my main goals in theological education, I did delve into the multi-volume A History of the Expansion of Christianity to research specific subjects. More than a decade ago, I purchased the full set at a Friends of the Library sale in Seattle and vowed to read the entire set. A few months ago, I finally set about to do so, starting Volume 1: The First Five Centuries. What I found was a rich resource and reading it to be a valuable experience, but the organization diffuse enough that it was difficult to read even entire chapters at a time. Yes, the book could use some of the call-outs, bullet lists, charts, and illustrations of modern book design, but it also disappoints in that it constantly provides a cross-section of facts and not those humanizing stories that help one apply history to pragmatic human experience. So, I am both glad that I struggled through A History of the Expansion of Christianity: Volume 1: The First Five Centuries but the experience was not as rich as I expected.
The organization of the book which seemed rather diffuse to me as a reader was actually rather deliberate on Latourette’s part. It is structured around seven questions which he addresses in his introduction: 1) what was the nature of the Christianity which spread (p. x), 2) why Christianity spread (p. xi), 3) why Christianity faced reverses (p. xii), 4) what methodology allowed Christianity’s spread (p. xii), 5) what effect did Christianity have on its environment (p. xii), 6) what effect did the environment have on Christianity (p. xiv), and finally, 7) what impact did the methodologies used for spreading Christianity have on the reciprocal effect of Christianity on environment and the obverse environment on Christianity (p. xv)? All good questions with #7 possibly being the most interesting of all. Yet, such an organization means that the chronological timeline is often sacrificed on the altar of attempting to answer these questions throughout the five centuries.
One disadvantage for me is that reading such a mid-20th century work means that some of the arguments cited may have already been discredited by a consensus of scholars in the field. Since I’ve already confessed that this isn’t my field, that can be dangerous. Of course, I’m such a skeptical reader anyway that it shouldn’t be too dangerous. For example, late in the book, Latourette cites a theory from B. W. Bacon’s An Outline of Christianity: Volume 1 (a volume not easily accessible according to a superficial Google search) that suggests Pauline writings about spiritual freedom influenced or inspired Gnostic antinomianism (p. 341, n. 314). It’s an interesting idea that’s “possible” but fits under the “correlation does not equal causation” part of my consideration. On the other hand, one can find plenty of consensus around his citation of Edwin Hatch’s 1899 (The Influence of Greek Ideas and Usages in the Christian Church) position that the allegorical method of interpreting scripture was an outgrowth of Hellenistic Judaism (p. 328, n. 236) and that many pre-Christian rhetorical forms and styles ended up in Christian preaching (p. 328, n. 239).
Another disadvantage for me is that the extensive and semi-annotated bibliography, though divided by chapters, has neither an alphabetical nor chronological (in terms of the presentation in the text) order. There is an attempt to order the references by subject matter, but some volumes and articles can fit more than one category. As a result, it takes longer than necessary to follow up on references. For example, I wanted to find a reference to Gerhard Uhlorn’s 1901 work, The Conflict of Christianity with Heathenism, from p. 343 (n. 320) that suggested Christianity would have divided into so many variants had it adopted Gnosticism that it would have died out just like Gnosticism. I ended up having to search on the web and, fortunately, found a PDF available for download. That’s okay, but it seems inefficient from a reference book standpoint.
Latourette’s thesis is that Christianity has: a) never been adopted where the pre-Christian culture remained intact (though it may have produced strong minorities—p 7), b) displacement and weakening of local cultures accelerated acceptance of Christianity (pp. 10-11, as did disorder, p. 147), c) Hellenistic education paved the way for Christianity because “Where Hellenistic education was unknown the new faith seems to have made little or no progress.” (p. 88), d) that the prime agents in expanding Christianity were “…not those who made it a profession or a major part of their occupation, but men and women who earned their livelihood in a purely secular manner and spoke of their faith to those whom they met in this natural fashion.” (p, 116), and e) generally worked a transformation in the lives of individuals which gave rise to communities which sought to practice ethics/ideals different from the mainstream culture (p. 368).
Along the way, Latourette does not ignore the history of theology and its important role in defining heresy. However, he tends to treat movements such as Arianism, Donatism, Marcionism, Manichaeism, Mithraism, Montanism, Novationism, and Pelagianism (among others) more in terms of their numerical/cultural success than their theological positions. To be sure, there are quick definitions, but those looking for a succinct history of theology in these pages are bound to be as disappointed as I was.
Still, there were several necessarily short discussions that I found intriguing. Latourette’s discussion of Constantine’s tax exemption for the clergy and its problems (pp. 173-174) seems to have become an economic drag in much the same way as Israel’s subsidizing of rabbis and Turkiye’s subsidizing of imams modern civilization. And where I was aware of the importance of the city of Ephesus in Asia Minor (p. 78), I was unaware of the connection of Ephesus with the spread of Christianity in the Rhone Valley of what is today, France (p. 98—Hint: It’s tied to Irenaeus.). His succinct discussion of the ten major Roman persecutions (starting on p. 136) was fascinating, though no one will be surprised with his overall summary that “…in the main the Church emerged more vigorous for the ordeal” (p. 161) and that by meeting milder attacks, the Church had developed a resistance that allowed it to resist more violent attacks (p. 162).
So, as one can tell, A History of the Expansion of Christianity: Volume 1: The First Five Centuries was not all that I wished it could be. And as one can tell from how long it took me to read the volume all the way through, it is by no means a page-turner. Yet, it has significant value and my marked up, personally indexed (nine handwritten pages of references) will certainly be helpful to me in the future. I’m not ready to start the second volume anytime soon, but I definitely plan to visit it before the end of next year.