The third book in the series of Easy Money by Vivek Kaul i.e. The Greatest Ponzi Scheme ever and how it threatens to destroy the global financial system is an insightful book about various causes behind the global financial crisis of 2008. The easy money policy of the United States, over-promotion of homeownership and resulting risks associated with various financial innovations resulted in the financial crisis of 2008.
Easy Money can spoil the entire system
The US government set-up Federal National Mortgage Association & Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation nicknamed as Fannie Mae & Fannie Mae respectively to incentivize homeownership by expanding the market of mortgages. Fannie Mae & Fannie Mae bought mortgages from banks and financial institutions and held them on its books. Fannie Mae & Fannie Mae incentivized the homeownership in the US.
The American economy was in a minor recession for a period of seven months before September 2001. In the aftermath of the September 2001 attacks the reports and statistics streaming in painted a very worrying picture regarding the economy of America. Americans had stopped spending on everything other than the items they would need in case there were more attacks. With spending collapsing, there was a danger of the minor recession turning into a major one. To prevent this, Alan Greenspan, the then chairman of the Federal Reserve, as he had in the past, decided to cut interest rates aggressively. Central banks cut interest rates in the hope that consumers borrow money to spend and businesses borrow money to expand, and so the economy grows. People did borrow and spend, but they went overboard with it.
The low-interest-rate regime created conditions for a bubble; the only difference this time around in comparison to the dot-com-bubble was that real estate replaced stocks as the medium of speculation. America’s new bubble after dot-com was real estate and it was built on the belief that ‘anyone can make money in real estate’.
Boom in sub-prime lending
Loans were easy to get, as the entire banking system concentrated on simply giving out loans rather than finding out the credibility of the borrower. Banks could securitize their loan. Banks pooled together similar kinds of loans, such as home loans or mortgages. Against these loans, they sold bonds to investors. These bonds paid a rate of interest, which was slightly lower than the interest that the borrower was paying on the loan. By selling bonds, the banks got back the money immediately, unlike earlier, when the money was stuck for the period of the loan. This money could be used to give out more loans. The fundamental way in which banks had operated had changed. Earlier, when a bank gave out a loan, the loan remained on its books, till the borrower completely repaid it. Hence, the risk associated with the borrower not repaying the loan was taken on by the bank.
When the borrower of the loan repaid it through an equated monthly installment (EMI), the banks passed on a major portion of this to the investors who had bought the bonds. The difference between what the borrower paid as interest and what the bond investor got as interest was money the bank made. It also got a commission on selling these bonds. Since the loans no longer remained on the bank’s books, it wasn’t interested in checking out the repayment capacity of the borrower any more. In fact, the more loans the bank gave out, the more bonds it could securitize, and hence, the more money it could make.
Due to historical low default rate (around 0.08-0.15%) on home mortgages the senior tranche was considered very safe, and Mezzanine and equity tranches i.e. lower tranches were considered a bit risky. The senior tranche was given a AAA rating. The Mezzanine and equity tranches got lower ratings. Pension funds, insurance companies liked to invest in these mortgage based securities as they were getting slightly higher returns as compared to treasury bonds at almost the same level of risk. The lower tranches of securities were a bit risky. Hedge funds and aggressive debt mutual funds were investing in the lower tranches chasing higher return.
Financial Innovation or Miss innovation
To give out more loans, banks came up with several creative products like option adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM). An option ARM was a thirty-year home mortgage in which the borrower had the option of paying a lower EMI initially. The lower EMI in the initial years made the interest-only option ARM an appealing product to borrowers. Banks came up with even more creative option ARMs to appeal to almost anyone even to those who couldn’t afford to pay EMRs. Most of the sub-prime borrowers had taken option ARMs, and these mortgages had limited documentation. By 2005, the lending terms had become so easy that loans could be made to someone with no income, no job or assets nicknamed as Ninja loans. Also the long-standing myth that real estate prices would keep going up due to economic and population growth was at work.
The easy money floating around led to an increase in homeownership in the United States. By 2005, 69% of US households owned their homes. Around half of this increase could be attributed to the sub-prime lending boom.
Low-interest regime supported by US dollar as global currency reserve
The United States is the biggest economy in the world. Export-led countries China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan export their goods to US, and earn dollars in the process. These dollars were then invested in treasury bonds as well as financial securities. With so much money chasing US financial securities, the issuers of these securities could in turn offer low rates of interest on them. The low-interest rate scenario despite US government running into a high budget deficit also allowed people to borrow money at low rates and buy homes.
The low-interest regime also incentivized people to use the equity in their homes and spend it on consuming other goods like electronics, cars etc. Home equity loans formed a major part of consumer spending before the financial crisis broke out. The US economy
The gaint Ponzi cycle worked as described in the book
“The United States shopped, China earned, China invested back in the United States, the United States borrowed, the United States spent, China earned again and China lent money again. The same was true with Japan, although to a lesser extent.
The entire US-China-Japan arrangement was like that. The Chinese invested money in various kinds of American financial securities, which helped keep interest rates low in the United States. This helped Americans to consume more. The more money found its way back into China (like a return on a Ponzi scheme) and was invested again in various kinds of American financial securities, helping keep interest rate low. It also kept the consumption going. Like in a Ponzi scheme, the dollars earned by China and other countries kept coming back to the United States."
Bursting of the sub-prime bubble
Nevertheless, as is the case with such bubbles, things started to unravel after a point of time due to over promotion of homeownership. Housing prices stopped going up and borrowers started defaulting on their mortgages. The defaults were also strategic as also people with high credit score until now were also defaulting. People who continued paying all other debts like car loans, credit cards also defaulted on EMI payment towards the house.
By 2007, the default rate on sub-prime loans had already gone into double digits and was at 12.6%. With homes being repossessed and foreclosed, the house prices started to fall. This meant the investors who had bought bonds issued against mortgages were also in trouble. Losses were huge on the sub-prime bonds that had been issued against sub-prime mortgages. The investment bank Lehman Brothers, which was a big investor in sub-prime bonds, went bust in mid-2008, and the US government had to come to the rescue of various financial firms such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG and Citigroup. This was done to ensure that the financial system did not come to a standstill.
Ironically, the solution central banks and governments the world over have found to counter the global financial crisis was what caused the problem in the first place. An era of easy money has been unleashed again in the case of global financial crisis of 2008. The Federal Reserve has been dousing small fires constantly by trying to dose all fires by keeping interest rate low, it has resulted in bug financial fire of 2008. Trying to incentivizing the housing market and not allowing the housing prices to fall as fast as they would have been a strategy that merely postpones the big fire or crisis.
The Greatest Ponzi Scheme ever and how it threatens to destroy the global financial system by Vivek Kaul is an insightful book and very much recommended for anyone interested in understanding the global financial crisis of 2008, and implications of easy money policy adopted by various government. The implications of easy money policy followed by governments are also very much applicable to individuals, it merely results in dosing of small fires and postponement of big fires. It’s important to be conscious of distractions due to the availability of easy money in life, it can result in big fire later on.