SUMMARY:
This thing is a pamphlet blown up to book size to make more money. The title is misleading. While he does mention a couple of places in the Bible he totally fails to answer the question and fails to address what the Bible says that negates assurance.
He mentions a number of Bible verses that might have some clue to the answer but you will have to go look them up for yourself as he prefers to babble on with stuff that is just his opinion.
The gory details:
Disappointed after 20 pages in and nothing of real value; and what was there was contradictory to his claims or else double talk to fill space.
He made some other interesting claims that were not really pertinent but were interesting if only he had given details instead of just alluding to something that might be true.
Based on the title I expected answers , not him 'exploring' issues. Give me what the Bible says, but not all the claims he makes with no support at all.
Hoping he has a point and gets to it soon. Will continue reading today.
Well it continues the same way. Many many unproven claims that might make up the answer if there were any evidence to back his claims up.
At times he uses logical fallacies. That brings the whole book into question.
And he fails to define terms that are the basis for reading this book in the first place:
in
fully formed
faith
believe , heart
works
has
yada yada
chapter 4 continues with promise but falls short.
logical fallacies, statements that *he* believes with no proof, confusing items w/o context to help understand, quotes without a source, no basis for his claims, way too many words with too little directly on the target.
Some good points that are believable but yet are unsupported, as is so much in this book.
chapter 5 is more of the same, with emphasis on more.
Many claims made with no basis to support them.
Uses undefined words and concepts in many places.
Too much double babble with no supporting info.
Makes vague allusions to John without explaining WTF he means.
Speaks for John without any backup proof.
More vague stuff.
Uses brand name beliefs that are not in the Bible.
Makes more vague claims and vague allusions to unclear stuff.
Needless logical fallacies.
On the good side he does point to John for some useful stuff which makes us do what we had bought this book for. He did point to one good verse that helps but is not the answer alluded to in the title.
Many claims about the bible without support.
Yet more logical fallacies. His claiming person X claims something is useless blather.
And still more logical fallacies.
I guess when you got nothing to say then just say somebody else claims something to break up the times you claim something but provide no evidence or support for that either.
to be continued - and I will continue but this is a long slow disappointing slog through too much extraneous double babble mixed thoroughly with logical fallacies and unsupported claims with waaay too little useful content.
The title says what the bible says about salvation but most of it is what he claims or claims what other people say with way too little from the Bible and what is from the Bible is usually done poorly and puts the burden back on us.
That is all mixed in with some brand name nonsense that is NOT in the Bible anywhere that I can find.
We could just read the Bible and be far ahead of where this book took us in spite of the claims in the Title.
But on to chapter 6 hoping it might get better. It does not.
Goes way downhill now starting with nearly 20 vague pronouns with no clue what he is referring to. I thought that was the style of modern novels not a serious book.
Maybe this book was only serious about making money for the author.
Many unfounded claims.
Common errors many people believe, which are NOT in the Bible.
Makes Bible claims again with no cites.
Makes unfounded projections of himself and starts claiming he knows what we think by saying you this, you that you, you you you, when it might be him but it is not what other people are or do or think or believe or whatever. Using second person is almost always a fail, like he failed here.
Uses David as an example when clearly David did not fit what he claims.
Makes irrelevant cites.
I am determined to finish this book because it claimed to discuss something that I really hoped to find out about. But you don't have to eat all of a rotten egg to know its rotten.
Soon I will attempt chapter 7 and hope it does not keep getting worse.
chapter 7 -
Many many many unfounded claims with absolutely no basis. Many seem like brand name beliefs unique to his religion.
Has paradoxical contradictions. Not helpful.
Uses undefined words. Has much unexplained stuff.
GROSS ERRORS wrt to what is in the Bible !!!!!!!!!!
A translation error in his copy? Everybody else seems to have gotten it right.
One wonders if he read the Bible more than once and how carefully that one time was.
This chapter was 'better' as if less worse is anywhere near good.
Logical fallacies again. so on to Chapter 8 tomorrow. But now I am thinking of skimming the rest or even DNF.
you dont have to eat all of a rotten egg to know its rotten.
tune in later to see if I persisted. Guess I have to persist if Paul said so:)
Chapter 8 is much better but still not focused on the issue in the title.
Many good points. All very very plausible. None of them backed up by anything than his opinion. But he does seem to be correct.
Confuses rewards as being needed as proof of belief and claims belief alone is enough.
Good points for adults saved as kids. Seem plausible. No Bible back up as usual.
Does a quote without basis to understand.
Refers to a verse to read to try to understand what he said. He needs to put those things in the text itself.
Keeps talking about heaven. Nowhere in the 632 some verses that mention heaven or heavens does the Bible actually say that WE GO TO heaven. All indications are that there is a new earth new heaven and a new Jerusalem and we live on the new earth.
Why else would we need a new body? In heaven we would be spirits wouldn't we?
Good cite about suicide not being unforgivable.
Possible erroneous claim about Bible as Paul seems to contradict his statement.
A big clue to the actual answer is hidden in one graf but is not fully supported by citations but does have some. So ALMOST the answer hidden here like a needle in a haystack.
Interpretation is highlighted as the Bible confuses many experts.
EG pre post mid no trib. Even the experts do not agree on what is meant.
He NEEDS to precisely define his words. He alluded to that problem in this chapter but then he keeps us in the dark by doing the same thing to us.
Egotistical claims but I would say not believing something here would be due to his bad writing not our spiritual status.
Keeps saying (go to) Heaven when there is no verse in the Bible that says that.
There are others that might indicate we go to paradise or other places the reader wishes meant heaven. But wasn't Eden paradise initially and it was on earth!
Chapter nine has a good title. Tomorrow we see if the writer does it justice even though it is not directly answering the question in the title of this overblown pamphlet.
Well the topic is useful even if not directly pertinent to the book's title.
More plausible things without any proof or attempt to support the claims.
Other claims with no proof and claims that are wild made up stuff from left field.
False claims with respect to Heaven.
Raises issue then says just reread chapter 3-5 again. WTF. An endless loop of zilch.
More logical fallacies. More wild statements with zero basis or support.
More Brand_name church's baloney about Heaven.
And yet more logical fallacies.
Gives us something to think about but answers really nothing we bought the book to find out about.
What will chapter ten have to say? Statistics says more of the same.
We will see tomorrow.
Can the tiger change his dots? Well neither can an author change his style.
There are many gospels. He never identifies the specific one and says what it is.
After much blather he states it briefly, but alludes to intracacies he omits. WTF!
More confusion about going to Heaven. Nowhere in the Bible is there any verse that says we go to Heaven.
Asks if we understand but nobody is ever clear and complete just allusions to something.
Terms not defined but used anyway but not as we know them.
More logical fallacies.
Puts onus on us to check verses he points to instead of including them and explaining why they fit his claims.
Confusing concerning Jesus and God. They are clearly two distinctly separate entities.
Only God knows when the end will be. Jesus obeys God. They sit on different thrones. Yet Jesus claims they are one. Clearly not the identical same one so what did that statement mean? They may both be the same type of being how can they be the same identical one as many claim?
Makes vague exhortations. More logical fallacies. Unfounded claims abound.
Some good tips that are believable but made questionable with all the other blather fallacies and double babble crapola.
More logical fallacies. One SPAG error. More unfounded claims. Makes up stuff with no basis or support to make us even think we should believe what he says.
GobbledyGook abounds. Plausible stuff with no proof is deprecated by the fallacies and provable errors.
Does he know that appeal to authority by citing what others claim is a logical fallacy or does he thinks it somehow makes him look smarter or what?
No definition or explanation or elaboration on key terms. Tells us to look them up.
Might have been a tract, even a magazine article, but not even a small booklet let alone this small book.
Totally disappointed as I had believed the title when I bought it.
==== 30 ====
****
PS post reading main book:
At the end he has useless discussion questions. He was supposed to give us an answer from the title of the book. All we got was blather. This guy is full of himself if he expects us to waste more time discussing things to figure out what he did not tell us.
After that he gives a section of cites which amount to a lot of logical fallacies by pointing to what some other guy claimed that he parroted in his book here.
Well easier than making footnotes I guess.
Looking at reviews of similar competing books they all seem to be similar in what they do not tell us in spite of their titles. Does anybody really know?
I have asked many preacher men this question and NOBODY HAS ANSWERED IT YET.
Some ignore me. Some blow me off with canned answers that are irrelevant. A couple try - sort of - but fall way short. One tried seriously but did not fully answer the question. The bigger the name the less they try to answer questions. I guess they would rather spend time making another tv commercial begging for money to help all the great work they claim they do.
While this book has some useful items they do not directly address the title of the book and what it claimed to help understand.
So we have to consider it all in context: “Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus”. Although written in Latin, for English common law, the actual meaning is “a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter.”
Whitney has zero credibility. Zero zip zilch nada bubkes squat nothing .....
And thus we need to reject his entire blather except for those very few points that were clearly established and are proven by other multiple credible sources not his logical fallacies of quoting somebody else who claimed something.
Overall conclusion: a possible magazine article done very badly.