Reading a book written in the XIX Century in the XI could be challenging, nonetheless I could not recommend this book less to anyone interested in history. Modern historians have lost, it seems, the beautiful storytelling of some of the past as is the case of Hodgkin. In his first Volume on his series of the Invaders of Italy, we are presented with the history of the Romans at the moment it was intertwined with that of the Goths, from roughly the middle IV Century after the death of Julian the Apostate until the death of Galla Placida in the middle of the V; we will be able to dive into the history of the decaying Roman Empire amidst internal struggles, usurpers and barbarian invasions, one of which, the one of Alaric and his "Visigoths" (Probably more correctly said just Goths or Tervingi) swept through the Julian Alps and heralded a series of events which would seen the end of the western Roman Empire.
Hodkin begins the book contextualizing the reader with summarizes on both the Roman imperial history from the time of Octavian, passing though the five good emperors, the crisis of the III Century, Diocletian and The dynasty initiated by Constantine; as well as with the history of the Goths, in which he mixes historical accounts with old legends to tell the migration of the teutonic people from their alleged homeland in Scandinavia southwards along the course of the Vistula to end at the shores of the black see and in direct contact with the Romans.
Even as the name of the book has Italy at its heart, here we are presented with a story situated on the vast territory of the Roman Empire; first more concentrated in the eastern part; where most of the first wars and treaties with the goths took place (without ignoring all events taking place in the west); and after the division of the empire between Honorius and Arcadius, the narration concentrates on the western Empire; giving special emphasis in this first volume to the roman civil wars between the emperors and some "usurpers", alongside its relationships with the visigoths, rather than any other barbarian group, which are only mentioned towards the end of the book (Will be treated in the next volumes).
The author mixes real history, beautiful poem extracts (incredibly translated into poetry also to english) with many welcome anecdotes take from their sources of different events taking place inside the empire; including some mythical and extraordinarius stories written by ancient sources to describe the many miracles of many of the christian mythological characters; although at any part he himself made any comment regarding his belief of them. His commentaries are actually one the best features of the book, in which his own thoughts on different events, people's characters, acts or situations are written down as another integral part of his narration.
The author has of course 150 years less knowledge of archeological discoverments and revisionist modern historian remarks and therefore could have many old prejudices or assumptions that we now either know to be false or that are in discussion; such as the thought of all Huns as savages, or the ever present racial supremacy of the "Aryan Race". We also seem in many of his remarks the black and white side of the many emperor's histories, as always history have been keaner with some and meaner with many.
By reading Hodkin one can not stop thinking of the series of errors and misrules that fell on the roman empire and specially on its western half. With every chapter and with the commentaries of the author one can not stop thinking that the empire survived rather longer than it should have, and was only saved by a mix strong men, luck and with some dubious accounts, on the change of plans of the empire's enemies. One sees how the whole struggle between christians were more nocive to the Empire than that of them with the "heathens", cracking the empire internally with time and setting up the ruptures that would made it impossible to save and the main political tendencies that would go on to dominate the middle ages.
"These sluggish Theodosians had not energy enough even to live” - Referring to Arcadius' death shows the contempt by which the author saw Honorius and Arcadius, seeing on The dynastic dreams of Theodosian and its division of the empire the main reason for its downfall. The many boy-emperors that came to rule nominally, as other bellicose men, mostly non-romans, alongside their mothers, held the real power, left the seat of the roman throne as nothing but a puppet figure and degrading the stand of the Romans towards its people, cementing even more rebellions.