Ok, whew. This book has some really great pros and some really bad cons.
Pros:
1. This book has some great anecdotes. Todd Starnes uses a lot of stories about intances of conservatives and/or Christians being forced to not express themselves, or intances of Christians/conservatives being forced to witness/participate in something that they are morally opposed to. He provides tons of examples on each subject and really explains a lot about the situation.
2. This book has a bunch of quotes and footnotes. It has 257 footnotes, which is fairly rare in a standard political book like this(some have 0 footnotes) so it was refreshing to have those. Starnes even quotes liberal organizations such as CNN, NBC, NYT, and WAPO, as well as several conservative organizations(including his own Fox News). The fact that he has so many footnotes/sources is really enticing to me.
3. Includes letters and personal quotes from the people involved, such as Mike Huckabee and Franklin Graham, which made the book more personal when referencing them in the stories.
Cons:
1. Starnes is downright mean some of the time. He can be rude and in every single section with every single story, finds some way to either name call, put down, or otherwise be rude to people who disagree with him. I'm all for standing on principle, but we as conservatives should seek to be kind and try to convince liberals to see our point of view, and being rude to them is hardly going to change their minds.
2. There are just a few too many times where Starnes repeats himself. He uses the same phrases over and over again and it becomes monotonous and annoying by the end. Especially when its part of the rudeness stated above. If you can't come up with a new phrase to use, I'd suggest just not using one and strictly telling the story exactly as it unfolded.
3. The book is really unevenly paced. It has several 20-40 page chapters, followed by a 2-5 page chapter followed by a 10 page chapter. It really felt disjointed and should have been paced a lot better. Either make the chapters evenly long, or evenly short, with only a few outliers. It's really tough to focus on a book paced this way.
Overall, the book is ok, and provides some great information, but should be read with a grain of salt. I am glad I read it, but can't reccomend it to anyone. 5.5 out of 10!