Metaphysical Anatomy Technique Volume 2 explains the core foundation and healing technique behind Metaphysical Anatomy Volume 1 which describes step-by-step guide for identifying the psychosomatic pattern related to 679 medical conditions. These conditions can be activated by circumstances in your present life, your ancestry, conception, womb, birth trauma, childhood or adult life. Volume 2 teaches you the foundation of Volume 1 including a powerful healing technique. This book is written for the benefit of therapists seeking guidance to improve their clients' quality of life. It is also easily accessible by the general public in search of answers for their own health, emotional and mental wellbeing This book is an invaluable reference that will support, guide and help those that have the willingness to change their lives and understand the language of their body
As an Author, Life Coach, Trauma Release Practitioner and Personal Development Teacher Evette Rose strives to support people in their healing journeys. She is the founder of the personal development company Metaphysical Anatomy, Rapid Growth Technique, Founder of the Inner Beauty States, and Founder of Awakened Human Dynamics. Evette is best known for her work in helping people to understand psychosomatic blocks behind their challenges and resolve trauma from their past. Freeing them to live successful and fulfilling lives. Evette's work is drawn from personal experience moving from a difficult past into a well-balanced life and career. She has traveled around the world twice and taught personal development seminars in more than 43 countries.
I enjoyed the book and it was a very entertaining weekend read - so why the low score? If you are interested in the theory behind Volume 1 - this expands a bit on what the author believes and works with when resolving the issues that are set out in detail in Volume 1 i.e. ancestral patterns, conception, birth etc. Although an entertaining read, the book gives you almost no practical tools (save for 4 short breath exercises and "use the white light" pointers) and is just an overpriced sales pitch for the even pricier online courses. With the wealth of useful information out there nowdays, this was a bit of a let down - had I picked it up as a entertaining fictional read, I would probably give it 3/4 starts, but since I picked it up as I was hoping to learn more practical tools and some interesting techniques, I can merely say it was "ok" especially considering the current price-point of this book.
Some books start with a great premise (and promise).
Like this one starts with a quote from Peter Levine
"Trauma is not what happens to us, but what we hold inside in the absence of an empathetic witness."
This single quote contains a valuable insight and the reason for one of the three stars I have given to this book.
Unfortunately, the rest of the book (or at least the parts I could get through) reads like someone's stream of consciousness, as if an truly inspired writer followed Julia Cameron's Morning Pages exercise diligently, mornings after mornings, and then decided to publish them as a book without help from an equally inspired editor.
Coming back to the opening quote of the book.
"Trauma is not what happens to us, but what we hold inside in the absence of an empathetic witness."
I guess that most of the rest of the book tries to expand on this first principle, outlining the tools to help us all connect with our inner healing power, that empathetic witness, but falls short of the goal, IMO, because of poorly organized content and incoherently expressed ideas.
For example, on page 21, the last paragraph begins with the following sentence.
"A sympathetic dominant person who has a chronic low level of stress is known to have sympathetic dominance."
If this sentence is trying to convey something meaningful, which it seems to be wanting to, that meaning eludes me!
On the next page, the writer uses the word `defragmented` (in quotes, probably emphasizing it as an important concept to understand), where she most likely meant `fragmented`[1].
Ultimately, what could possibly have been a good book, considering it touches on many important ideas and contains crucial insights from other experts, fails to become one, marred by incoherent style and poor editing.