This was pretty informative. It was repetitive at times even with a lot of the repeated sections of text across essays taken out. But that’s the nature of an essay collection by someone who writes on the same topic.
I think now this book could be criticized for not being intersectional enough - but I think most of her writing is from the 80s and 90s, so that’s not shocking.
Takeaways:
1) Because capitalism insists on a certain level of unemployment, and people with disabilities are less likely to be employed because of the inconvenience/cost of accommodating them, people with disabilities are disproportionately represented in the unemployed. This is in the nature of capitalism itself.
2) Many ADA protections are ineffective or have been watered down (at least at the time she was writing). She finds anti-discrimination laws to be too weak to help.
3) Discrimination cases bring in this Catch 22 situation where the worker needs to be disabled enough to be accommodated but not so disabled that they can’t work. But they have to be too disabled to work in order to get aid while seeing their discrimination case through.
Quotes:
In contrast, we take the view that disability is a socially created category derived from labor relations, a product of the exploitative economic structure of capitalist society: one which creates (and then oppresses) the so-called disabled body as one of the conditions that allow the capitalist class to accumulate wealth.
If workers were provided with a federal social safety net that adequately protected them through unemployment, sickness, disability, and old age, then business would have less control over the workforce because labor would gain a stronger position from which to negotiate their conditions of employment, such as fair wages and safe working conditions.
If one is not disabled because one’s condition is “correctable” with medication, wheelchairs, prostheses, hearing aids, insulin, etc., how can one expect to receive a reasonable accommodation which depends on being defined as “disabled”? [referring to the watering down of ADA protections]
… it will be the unspoken argument for assisted suicide—cost containment—that will ensure the eventual passage of laws legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Are people who seek assisted suicide choosing death or being cornered into it by inadequate national disability policy, a lack of quality long-term and palliative care that, in their absence, makes life so unbearable that death seems preferable to life?