“It is simply not true to say, “The church has replaced Israel as God’s people,” “Israel rejected Jesus and the gospel,” or “the church is the new Israel.” Luke’s story demands that we do better in nuancing how we speak of the origins of the church.”
This quote summarizes what is the overwhelming theme of Acts according to Jipp. Repeatedly and emphatically Jipp is concerned with showing how the church is the continuation of Israel not the replacement of it. He does well to illustrate this and has some very remarkable observations between Luke-Acts as well as the Old Testament. I also greatly appreciate his emphasis on divine action that Acts illustrates as well as that is continued now.
However, because of the overwhelming emphasis on Israel it seemed to underemphasize the newness of the Holy Spirit in the church. That is, the out pouring of the Spirt was subjected to the over arching theme of Israel in a manner that almost made the Spirit to not be all that significant. This I was not a fan of for certainly there is a tension between God’s confined work in his people that was began with Israel and extended to Gentiles, however Acts does indicate a remarkable new work of God through the Spirit that cannot be under emphasized in any way. I personally see the Spirit’s powerful work in the church to unite all peoples and advance the Gospel as the primary lens of Acts, which indeed is a new work of God just as much as the confined work through Israel. The nature of telling the new and continued works are indeed a tension for many, but to over emphasize the continued and understanding emphasize the new I personally believe is not the best reading of Acts.