Jazz: A People's Music

by Sidney Walter Finkelstein, Geoffrey Jacques (Foreword)

This book is one of the most improtant works ever written on Jazz music. It is a virtual manifesto agains the ghettoization and the racist pigeonholing thast has afflicted the public's appreciation of this great music since its beginnings as ragtime a century ago. It exposes the lies and misconceptions that have surrounded this music, the attempts-made anew, it seems, each decade-to deny that jazz is one of the leading artistic forces of our time. It does this by convincing its readers of the special beauty of this great music of the Afro-American people

Genres: Music

180 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1948

About the author

Sidney Finkelstein, born in Brooklyn, New York on July 4, 1909, received his Bachelor’s degree from City College in New York in 1929 and his A.M. from Columbia University in 1932 before he became a renowned critic of music, literature, and the arts. In 1955, he earned a second master’s degree from New York University. During the 1930s he served as a book reviewer for the Brooklyn Daily Eagle and worked for the United Postal Service. In the 1940s he joined the music staff of the Herald Tribune and also served as a music reviewer for several other publications including New Masses, Masses, and Mainstream. Finkelstein became active in the Communist Party U.S.A. (CPUSA) where he served as the party’s leading musical and cultural theoretician. Finkelstein applied his interpretation of Socialist Realism in several books on arts and culture, the most famous being Jazz, a People’s Music (1948). Between 1951 and 1973 he served on the staff of Vanguard Records, a New York based record label that specialized in jazz and classical recordings. In 1957 he was called to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee for his Communist party affiliation. Finkelstein died in Brooklyn, New York on January 14, 1974.

Reviews

[Jeff Crompton]

My favorite jazz critic, Max Harrison, wrote an essay praising this book, which introduced him to jazz. When I read Harrison's piece, I started looking for a copy of Finkelstein's book, and found a first edition years ago.

Jazz: A People's Music is not the first book written about jazz, but it's the first really excellent one. When the music was only 50 years or so old, Finkelstein showed a depth of understanding that has eluded many jazz writers in the years since. In an era marked by partisan bickering (New Orleans purism vs. big band swing vs. bebop), he saw that the various styles of jazz have more in common than most fans could see at the time. He grasped the importance of the blues to the jazz language, and pointed out the multi-voiced melodic nature of much jazz - a characteristic that is even found in solos. Many of Sidney Bechet's or Louis Armstrong's improvisations consist of phrases playing off each other in an oppositional manner - they are, in effect, duets played by one musician.

Finkelstein's view of jazz is not without its flaws. These show up mostly in the last chapter, "The Future of Jazz." In it, Finkelstein outlines his view that the inevitable next step in the development of the music will be compositional, not improvisational. Well, to be sure, there was some amazing music created by jazz composers in the 1950s - George Russell, Gil Evans, Teddy Charles, Jimmy Giuffre, etc. But ask any reasonably informed jazz fan to discuss the decade after this book was written, and he/she will probably mention Miles Davis, Sonny Rollins, and Clifford Brown before any of the musicians I just mentioned. (Monk, of course, was a special case. But one of the few mentions of Monk in this book shows a profound misunderstanding of that genius's music: "Monk sees always the strange chord, often at the price of an unorganized piece of music." To be fair, Monk had recorded very little by the time Finkelstein was writing his book.)

Since this book is so little known, I'll end this review with some quotes.

Jazz is often a music of great basic simplicity, and gripping rhythmic force. It is also, at the same time, a music of great subtlety.

At each period of its development, it produced a very great music. And each of these musical developments was created by the jazz musician, predominately Negro, when it answered to his needs. It was dropped by him when he felt new needs, and met new problems that called for a different music. Anguished outcries rose from those who had painfully learned to like the abandoned music and were expressed in the most elaborate theoretical formulations. It is true that with each step forward values were lost as well as gained. But the process of change, development, exploration of new materials and new emotions, is basic to jazz as it is to all living music.

Creative jazz has style. It applies the test of economy to every note and instrumental sound. It doesn't use a dozen notes where three will do; it doesn't use a dozen instruments when one will adequately handle the melodic line; it doesn't use chords where the melodic feeling fails to call for them. Any element, to be included, must have a meaning, something to say, that would be lost if omitted. And it creates so complete a unity between melodic line, rhythmic beat, accent and instrumental sound that we do not hear those elements separately.

Bix [Beiderbecke] made many records but is not well represented on them. We get an idea of his powers by piecing sections of them together, and imagining the music multiplied.

Charlie Parker is almost wholly a blues performer, as moving in his own way as Johnny Doods in the old music. "Billie's Bounce" is perhaps the most extraordinary of his blues solos, with "Cool Blues," "Relaxing at Camarillo" and "Buzzy" very fine. His use of the blues "break" in "Billie's Bounce" and the Red Norvo "Congo Blues" is a revelation.

And Finkelstein's conclusion:

Jazz holds within itself a precious emotional realism.... It is one of America's most precious cultural possessions, and its continued life is bound up with our life as a free people.

[Miru]

Loved it, very informative, but i did feel like it was repeating itself a little. Still, very enjoyable!

[Gary Bono]

Excellent overview of the subject. Still applicable after all these years.