Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Contesting the Past

Vietnam: Explaining America's Lost War

Rate this book
In Vietnam , Gary R. Hess describes and evaluates the main arguments of scholars, participants, and journalists, both revisionist and orthodox in their approach, as they try to answer fundamental questions of the Vietnam War.

232 pages, Paperback

First published May 2, 2008

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Gary R. Hess

22 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
11 (33%)
4 stars
15 (45%)
3 stars
7 (21%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for James Murphy.
982 reviews33 followers
August 24, 2009
This is an enormously valuable book for those interested in the Vietnam War. Taking the several most divisive points of the debate about the meaning of the war, Hess presents the revisionist and orthodox (hawk and dove) positions on those issues. The arguments are laid out clearly and objectively in point/counterpoint fashion. A careful, understandable discussion of an opaque subject. Hess did a good job with controversial material. I admire his excellent analysis, feeling it came from comprehensive research. His impartiality is so impeccable, his arguments for the opposing arguments so convincing, that I'd find myself believing first one position then the other. Good historical writing.
Profile Image for Michael Loveless.
342 reviews4 followers
February 7, 2016
The book is part of the “Contesting the Past” series. Each chapter takes a specific question related to the war and gives the traditional (anti-war) view and the revisionist (pro-war) view of it. Chapters include: Was it necessary? Was there a missed opportunity to get out? Could an all-out effort have won it? Could a “hearts and minds” approach have won it? Did the media lose the war? Was Tet a win or loss? Did Nixon-Kissinger unnecessarily prolong the war? The author appears to have a bias toward the traditional view that the war was unwinnable. He concludes each chapter with a statement that says the evidence for the traditional view is stronger.

The book is excellent. It is a kind of FAQ’s of the Vietnam war that gives a pretty fair opportunity for both sides to answer. It is thought provoking.

It could be used as a guide for discussing the war with a class. It would be a great text for a class on Vietnam.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews