Were the famous moon landings simulated by NASA? From the very first manned flight into orbit right up to the present day there have been serious anomalies in the official narrative of the conquest of space. Bestselling author Gerhard Wisnewski dissects the history of space travel in minute detail, beginning with the first Russian missions in the early 1960s, to the final American moon project of Apollo 17 in 1972, and onwards to the American landings planned in future. Using forensic methods of investigation, he pieces together a complex jigsaw to reveal a disturbing picture of lies, falsifications and simulations. Not only does he cast serious doubt on the possibility of humans ever having landed on the moon, but he also reveals a catalogue of untruths and propaganda in the Cold War struggle for supremacy between the Soviet Union and the USA.Wisnewski produces reams of scientific evidence that calls for a reassessment of the received wisdom regarding the history of space exploration. The true story, he suggests, has a more sinister undertone. Beneath the guise of civilian space travel the US military has been developing fearsome new equipment and weapons which are being secretly stationed in space. The aim is to militarize the orbit around the earth, with our planet and each one of us as the potential targets. It is provided with over 200 illustrations.
NASA recently "lost" the original Apollo 11 moon landing videos. Is any more proof needed that NASA's moon landing footage was a fraud? The only piece of exculpatory evidence mysteriously goes missing? Just how foolishly credulous are the American people?
The case is made for why and how the Apollo missions were used to fake a moon landing. You may not agree with the conclusions but this book lays out the arguments in great detail. Very provocative.
The first section reads like a first rate thriller.
Nice context on the USSR efforts before the U.S.
Not every aspect of the hoax was covered and the last section on space domination/world domination seems dated. Nothing new, there.
Easy way to finish this argument once and for all? Send a human being through the Van Allen radiation belt, have the journey tracked and reported by every satellite in the heavens, and verified by every country in the world, and, then, have that astronaut return intact and alive. Follow that astronaut for 4-5 years after the journey to make certain there were no adverse effects from the journey and then I will believe the tin-foil BS about the Moon landing.
Otherwise, shut up. It was a Big Lie. The U.S. can't even send a Roomba up to the Moon.
And, the millions spent on creating 20+ versions of simulated Moon dust?