Disclaimer(s):
1. I am interested in factual History, rather than novels or fictional depictions of historical entities. I have read this volume with that hat on.
2. As an epic, I doubt there would any Indian who is unaware of Mahabharat and I belong to that humongous population. My intention was/is to gain at least a brief understanding of the political and social events during that era. The simultaneous and sequential events that occurred in the then known geographical areas are what I wanted to learn from this epic.
3. My views should be read and interpreted with the above two points in mind, I have no intentions and capabilities to evaluate or criticize a timeless legend like Mahabharat and it's characters.
4. Last but not the least, I am completely aware of the rule of reading History that one should not judge the past based on the present standards, paradigms and situations.
Impressive:
1. The events, since the formation of universe, are stated briefly. Cosmologists, physicists, chronologists and many more scientific streams might not be impressed but for a common man, it provides a starting point. I recall one section where the law of conservation of energy is stated, of course, in a different manner. Aplenty individuals, their family trees are stated which definitely deserves an independent research in genetics.
2. Briefly touches the social and economic aspects of the society during the various regimes and eras. For example, the state of rainfall, agriculture and animal husbandry, the lifestyle of the various professionals, famines/droughts, life expectancy and so on. It was not uncommon for women to propose the men they liked/took fancy.
3. There exist branches of mathematics like predictive modeling, data mining and so on which analyze current and past events, and then predict the future events. When we read about the lifestyle and deeds of entities (I don't want to call them 'Gods' but they weren't common menfolk either!) like Vyas, Krishna, many Rishis, etc., we realize that they were aware of so many minute details and events that happened in the past, and those happening in their present, that they could have easily got a fair idea of what was coming. Their correlation and deduction genius shouldn't be undermined!
4. The common man knows about Mahabharat from sources like the TV series, the tales passed on over generations, the various personal takes on Mahabharat published as novels, books, lectures, etc. and now-a-days, social media. Read this volume and you will learn aplenty lesser-known/concealed/distorted events. The list is too long to post here e.g: Dhristarashtra's dialogue with/confession to Sanjay where the former admits that he was well aware since the beginning that if a war happens between Kauravas and Pandavas, the Kauravas will be vanquished. Karna is celebrated as a hero/anti-hero in the recent History, well, his behaviour proves him otherwise. Duryodhan's jealousy and desire to grab the riches of Indraprastha but his fear of military and financial might of Pandavas is NOT told to the common man, in any way.
Now, why only 3 stars?
Disappointing:
1. For the very two points in the 'Disclaimer' section, the book disappoints a lot - what were Kauravas, Karna, Ashwathama and others up to when Pandavas were involved in the events described at so much length. At a point, the book smelled of the paradox 'Victors write the History'. Khandav-van carnage by Krishna and Arjun is glorified? Seriously???
2. Krishna is one of the entities I respect a lot, mainly because of his statesmanship. At least, this volume sheds no light on what makes him great! Except the known events like freeing kings and womenfolk from the captivity of Jarasandh and Narkasur, respectively, the texts and the characters (Bhishma, Pandavas, etc.) keep on showering praise on him while amateur readers, who wish to know the facts, are stumbling in the dark. Vyas knew that mere mortals of Kaliyug are gonna read this epic, right?
3. The book provides aplenty details and is having a gradual pace till the birth of Pandavas but then all the way till their 13 years in exile, it gallops, and misses details e.g: How was Hastinapur doing financially/economically since Duryodhan became the crowned prince, how were the masses perceiving the administration of Dhristarashtra (a lot is written about Krishna's and Yudhishthir's administration). A curious reader is left guessing how was the social and political situation during all these years.
4. Lack of details that are required to establish chronology and timeline e.g: Since when were Karna and Duryodhan knew each other? Was it during their education? Or when there was an exhibition of skills(of Kauravas and Pandavas) in Hastinapur?
It is a must-read book for every Indian. It provides practical insights abou human history and behaviour, provides important, timeless political lessons. As a history enthusiast, despite of numerous disappointments, this book cannot be left unread!