In 1818, the revolutionary government of Chile was poised to attack Peru, the last bastion of Spanish power on the continent. The new ruler, the half-Irish Bernardo O'Higgins, threw his energies into creating a navy. Short of local naval manpower, the Chileans looked to Britain and the United States for the sailors needed to man and command their squadrons, many of them unemployed veterans of the Royal Navy. And, to be the new navy's commander-in-chief, they recruited one of the most fearless and controversial officers of the Thomas, Lord Cochrane. The story of the naval war in the Pacific is an exciting one. Under Cochrane's audacious leadership, coasts were blockaded, fortresses stormed and ships seized in bloody hand-to-hand fighting. The result was that Chile and Peru gained their freedom from Spain, while Cochrane enhanced his reputation and made a fortune in pay and prize money. For one hundred and fifty years, the accepted story of the war has been based on Cochrane's own version of events. But how accurate is Cochrane's account? To find out, Brian Vale goes back to the original documents, despatches, diaries and newspapers. The result is a new and vivid account of the war in the Pacific and a reassessment of one of Britain's legendary naval heroes seen at the peak of his career.
Brian Vale is a naval historian. He was a British Council officer in Brazil, the Middle East and Spain and from 1987-1991 he served as Assistant Director General in London. He was a contributor to the official history of the Brazilian Navy.
This is a 3.5 but I'm rounding up. I'm in a good mood.
This is a useful book for puncturing the unctuous balloon of Cochrane-worship that pervades naval history. If Cochrane is a personal hero, it either is or is not the book for you, your temperament depending.
It is, however, not quite what it's advertised to be. It's primarily about Cochrane's time with Chile with less attention paid to the other Spanish-American (or Portuguese-American, if we count Brazil) countries who employed him. There are editorial flaws: the text contains some egregious grammatical (it's vs. its) errors and spelling, too (Marriott for Marryat, for example). And somewhere about halfway through, someone started hitting the exclamation point and never let up! After a while, it was like reading history written by a teenage girl! Like this! It drove me absolutely mad!
But: overall, quite useful. The author relies on letters and South American sources, not Cochrane's half-baked memoirs (or the spoon-fed Maria Graham travel writings). It would have been better had they been more frequently cited, however.